PhD/PsyD Foot in the Door for Internship

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

FreudisMyHomie11

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
16
Reaction score
58
So I am a 4th year PsyD student who will be applying for internship in the Fall. I understand folks are knee deep in the interview process right now. I'm just curious reflecting back on your APPI and internship materials what were some of the items that you think training directors really valued or that landed you the interview? (I know this may be subjective). Also I am not looking at any specialty and I think the bulk of my training has been really diverse. Thanks!!
 
To expand a bit...there are also a number of current and former DCTs who post on SDN, they may also have some useful feedback about what they look for in an applicant. Sites all have their own approaches to reviewing and ranking students, but I think there are probably a bunch of shared points across them.

I’m not involved in internship/fellowship training anymore, but here are a few things I would look for when reviewing apps for both settings:

1. Fit. Is this student a good fit for the training program? Can we meet the students needs/wants (in that order)? How would they fit into our hospital/site program? Would our training benefit their training path? Do they need something we don’t offer?

2. How far along in their dissertation are they now? Are they done or on track to finish on time (for post-doc)? Besides fit and big red flags (e.g. disciplinary/academic infractions, DUIs, etc), this was the single biggest factor in inviting a student. My former internship site was one of the few that offered carve-out research time (~4-6hr/wk) that could be used to work on your dissertation or current research, but this is rare. Sites want 100% of their trainees to secure post-docs during the current cycle bc getting stuck in limbo can be rough and sometimes detrimental to a trainee’s career path. It also is something most trainees ask about “where do trainees go for post-doc/fellowship?”

3. Would I want to work with this person? I know this sounds very random, but certain personality styles can be difficult to supervise or even tolerate over the course of a year.
 
One of the things that usually guarantees that you absolutely do NOT get an interview from me is if your cover letter does not explain why this site specifically meets your training goals and why you're passionate about these goals. Why should I invest a year+ in training someone who isn't passionate about this work? I'd rather give the opportunity to someone who is clearly interested (and has somehow demonstrated this interest, through research, clinical, and/or extracurricular activities/jobs) and has some passion for the work we do. Granted, it's a specialty internship, but still...show some enthusiasm. As for the winning combo, there really isn't one -- it's more of a total package thing. Fit of interests and personality with the site and our supervisors is always important.
 
Top