
Originally posted by slave4MD
As for DO schools, they're good but think long and hard as to whether you really want that DO letters after your name. Except for people like us, most won't know what a DO is. A lot of DOs end up in primary care and they prefer to sit for MD residencies.
Originally posted by drusso
Nurses carry out my orders, pharmacies fill my prescriptions, patients seem to take my advice. I've matriculated into one of the top five programs in my field---what sort of disadvantages should I be looking out for?
From the recent article posted on Yahoo Health News found in thread link posted by Fenrezz: "When people ask me, I use the analogy of the Democrats and the Republicans. They are both writing laws, but are coming at them with different philosophies," says Dr. Tyler Cymet, a doctor of osteopathy and a professor at Johns Hopkins Medical School in Baltimore. "M.D.s and D.O.s are both in the business of healing, but they have different philosophies and a different orientation."
Adds Dr. J. Edward Hill, chairman of the American Medical Association: "The position of the American Medical Association is that M.D.s and D.O.s are perfectly comparable. There are no significant differences between the two. We are very supportive of each other, and it's been a good arrangement."
Originally posted by maysqrd
I think Slave4MD needs to keep up on his homework.
Originally posted by premed128
If I need a Doctor, and I see a DO in a white coat, I will be very satisfied because I know for sure that a DO has compelted his education in the most scientifically advanced country in the world, USA.
A doctor with a DO can only be a grduate from the US and no where else. As far as MDs are concerned , an MD could be a graduate from a third world country, with a very low and primitive standard of education and when I see an MD, I am always worried about his credentials.
Originally posted by slave4MD
But it's the residencies and fellowships that are more important.
A DO might have graduated from a US med school but he might land in a DO medical center for primary care. You can't deny that most DOs end up in primary care and that proves that DOs are not as skilled as US MDs. Also, DOs usually compete for MD residencies, not DO residencies.
My undergrad had a presitigious medical center, and there were only 2 DOs there but 4 MDs from SGU/Ross.
On the other hand, an SGU or Ross grad ( not bad, clinicals in the US )might get into NYU, Cornell, or Penn State for residencies ( it happened many times ). Come fellowship time, the grades he recieved from his residency will be more important than the medical school he went to.
Would you still go to the DO who went to the US school but landed in a crap hospital or the Carribean MD that made it into university hospitals? Of course, it could happen the other way around.
Also, patients rarely go to doctors and ask what school they went to. But they will want to check your title, which would be an MD or DO. Like most people, they won't know what a DO is.
Originally posted by slave4MD
You can't deny that most DOs end up in primary care and that proves that DOs are not as skilled as US MDs.
The MDs I have talked to (attendings, fellows, residents, and allopath med students) have shown no bias against osteopathic medicine. The bias that I've seen mainly originates from pre-meds.
You can't deny that most DOs end up in primary care and that proves that DOs are not as skilled as US MDs
Originally posted by slave4MD
You can't deny that most DOs end up in primary care and that proves that DOs are not as skilled as US MDs.

Originally posted by slave4MD
But it's the residencies and fellowships that are more important.
A DO might have graduated from a US med school but he might land in a DO medical center for primary care. You can't deny that most DOs end up in primary care and that proves that DOs are not as skilled as US MDs. Also, DOs usually compete for MD residencies, not DO residencies.
Osteopathic medicine *EMPHASIZES* primary care training as part of a tradition and philosophy of whole person wellness, not because DO's lack the skill set to be a competent specialist. An argument can be made (and many specialists have said so) that being a good primary care doctor is actually more difficult than being a specialist because one must deal with a wider spectrum of undifferentiated disease and pathology.
Are you kidding me? You tend to pull up the 3 muslim students' story to compare schoools? That is different altogether because that is a "he said, she said" story. What makes you think the lady is telling the truth? Did you watch the 3 students on Larry King Live?
Originally posted by WannabeDO
Well, I graciously will insert my foot in my mouth. I must explain though that the west coast media did not continue with the story beyond the initial allegations. I remember hearing a report saying that the three admitted to saying something out loud because they were offended by the attention they were receiving in the restaurant. I read the transcripts from the larry king interview and take back what I said about the three students. That being said, I take exception to your calling me a *******. At worst I'm misinformed about one of the things that I said in my post. I stand by everything else that I said.
Originally posted by soopa
I disagree, SGU offers a very good education. They have a decent standard for admissions as opposed to Ross. You would be placed in some special program for low MCAT scores. At Ross, yes you have to repeat the entire year or something......I am not quite sure. But I have to say St. Georges does offer an education comparable to most US medical schools.
Since I received my score, I decided to not send in my secondaries. A 20 just doesn't cut it-I was getting 24's on practice tests... Oh well.