Formulas in FA we DON'T need to memorize?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Qwest

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
How about:

1. GFR=Kf[(Pgc-Pbs)-(pie gc)
2. Net filt pressure
3. acid base compensation for Resp Acid & Alk

That's all that comes to mind. Do we really need to know these?
 
Qwest said:
How about:

1. GFR=Kf[(Pgc-Pbs)-(pie gc)
2. Net filt pressure
3. acid base compensation for Resp Acid & Alk

That's all that comes to mind. Do we really need to know these?

Well since you can't use a calculator, the Henderson-Hasselbach equation seems to be offlimits unless they give you a simple log. I think it's a crapshoot whether you learn all these formulas or not. Just pick out the ones you can and hope to reason through the ones you can't. Let the units in the answer choices be your guide. Work backward.
 
there are very few calculations you need to know. off the top of my head, some of those are odds ratio, relative risk, and hardy-weinberg. in general, physiology equations do not need to be memorized, but you should know the concepts.

e.g. increase vessel diameter, decrease resistance.
e.g. oncotic and hydrostatic pressure oppose each other and a drop in one causes flow from one compartment to the other.
e.g. inulin approximates GFR
e.g. if you stick an acid in a more acidic environment it will be protonated, if you stick it in a base it will be deprotonated

as pox mentioned, working backward is a nice workaround. it's pretty surprising how often that trick works... at least when it comes to qbank and my limited exposure to step1 questions of that sort. look at the units, make up some way of getting those units, and see what number you get.

edit based on post below:
definitely know sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV.
definitely know clearance.
 
2 friends took it last month.......

1st friend:
MAP= CO * TPR
Clearance eq

2nd friend:
Starling forces eq
relative risk
specificity
 
Top