Friday the 13'er - Game Thread

Veterinary Science Graduate Programs from U. of I.
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Members do not see this ad.
Navilly said:
Ah yes let’s lynch an important player when village on day 1. Yes they are dangerous as a wolf. But that’s why you use your lynch Lupin by day 3/4 button if we aren’t getting wolves.
Click to expand...
This strikes me as weird only because I got in hot water last game using the same reasoning. Incidentally I was a wolf, which really had nothing to do with it, because that is how I play it.....don’t Lynch good players unless you have a reason.

Anyway, what is weird is that Nav was a (assistant) mod last game and saw the outcome of that. Why would he use the same approach that had me under suspicion the rest of game? Just seems weird. Not wolfy but weird,
 
Official Day 1 Lynch Tally
SAR (1) - SOV
dubz (1) - genny
allie (1) - dubz
genny (1) - ny
Lupin (2) - miz, SAR
Coop (1) - MsP
SOV () -
ny (1) - Coop
MsP (1) - Nav
miz (1) - Lupin

10/13
lynch close in ~26.5 hours
 
StartingoverVet said:
This strikes me as weird only because I got in hot water last game using the same reasoning. Incidentally I was a wolf, which really had nothing to do with it, because that is how I play it.....don’t Lynch good players unless you have a reason.

Anyway, what is weird is that Nav was a (assistant) mod last game and saw the outcome of that. Why would he use the same approach that had me under suspicion the rest of game? Just seems weird. Not wolfy but weird,
Click to expand...
Did you have an option to hold onto your innocent child announcement? Why did you just start out with it if so?
 
Lupin21 said:
:=|:-):
Click to expand...

Me being in the lead gives me the least amount of things to think about

So allow me to throw some silly British insults at you

tenor.gif
 
SARdoghandler said:
Mmmm is that failure on the lynchee's part for not spewing village enough? Or on the lynchers for not being more astute? 🤔
Click to expand...
You'll notice there are plenty of villagers who don't get lynched often as village, so i do think there is an art to it for sure.
 
Lupin21 said:
Yes. Unless there is a strong wolf leading the voting and not enough strong villagers.
Click to expand...

So you wouldn't say there are certain easy lynches because the lynchers just get comfortable and don't want to re-evaluate or do not pick up on someone clearly village? For example, MsP's frequent early lynches as village
 
SARdoghandler said:
So you wouldn't say there are certain easy lynches because the lynchers just get comfortable and don't want to re-evaluate or do not pick up on someone clearly village? For example, MsP's frequent early lynches as village
Click to expand...
I can tell you for sure that her replies when she is in the lead is not village friendly having played with her my last game.
 
Lupin21 said:
I can tell you for sure that her replies when she is in the lead is not village friendly having played with her my last game.
Click to expand...

What do you consider "village friendly"? I'm genuinely curious because I feel like I don't see movement off of wagons on this site often except when there are vouches or mechanics
 
SARdoghandler said:
What do you consider "village friendly"? I'm genuinely curious because I feel like I don't see movement off of wagons on this site often except when there are vouches or mechanics
Click to expand...
For me it comes down to the in real time replies to actual questions about thought process for reading village. I think if people are going to vote someone, they should do everything in their power to get the questions they have about said person asked and answered and evaluate based on those responses. I usually find my village that way, or as a wolf, manipulate people if they are not good at explaining themselves in accordance with my questions.
 
Lupin21 said:
For me it comes down to the in real time replies to actual questions about thought process for reading village. I think if people are going to vote someone, they should do everything in their power to get the questions they have about said person asked and answered and evaluate based on those responses. I usually find my village that way, or as a wolf, manipulate people if they are not good at explaining themselves in accordance with my questions.
Click to expand...
Fair enough
 
Lupin21 said:
For me it comes down to the in real time replies to actual questions about thought process for reading village. I think if people are going to vote someone, they should do everything in their power to get the questions they have about said person asked and answered and evaluate based on those responses. I usually find my village that way, or as a wolf, manipulate people if they are not good at explaining themselves in accordance with my questions.
Click to expand...

This is completely fair. Does that change at all if it's D1? Or, I guess more tangibly, what questions would you be able to ask on a typical d1 or how would they differ from later days? I'm curious how this changes, if at all, when most votes are based on feels and other random things.
 
Ms Procrastinator said:
Fair enough
Click to expand...
I think for sure some of it comes down to people just going with it though. I don't think there are enough good cross examiners sometimes to allow a villager up for lynch to prove themselves. There have to be good questions asked if you are to answer in a village manner. lol
 
SARdoghandler said:
This is completely fair. Does that change at all if it's D1? Or, I guess more tangibly, what questions would you be able to ask on a typical d1 or how would they differ from later days? I'm curious how this changes, if at all, when most votes are based on feels and other random things.
Click to expand...
Like I said, for me, I ask a mixture of questions about a person's thought processes and/or small talk and gauge for truthfulness and ease.
 
SARdoghandler said:
Does all of this we've been doing count as small talk?
Click to expand...
It certainly doesn't make me want to change my vote yet if that's what you're asking. I'd say currently you've hopefully been feeling me out, but I don't have a read on you based on this by any means. I will ask you what the point of having someone in the lead but then switching before you had a real reply or time to evaluate that first vote did for helping you think about things.
 
Lupin21 said:
It certainly doesn't make me want to change my vote yet if that's what you're asking. I'd say currently you've hopefully been feeling me out, but I don't have a read on you based on this by any means. I will ask you what the point of having someone in the lead but then switching before you had a real reply or time to evaluate that first vote did for helping you think about things.
Click to expand...

Because I got information and/or reaction from both you and Nav on that move which allowed me to give some village points to you and some sketch points to Nav. Given that, I was ready to see what the reaction would be if I put someone else into the lead. I had plenty of time to evaluate before the switch and I would consider the replies/reactions it garnered "real". It may not be your choice of strategy, but that doesn't mean I didn't do it with purpose
 
SARdoghandler said:
Because I got information and/or reaction from both you and Nav on that move which allowed me to give some village points to you and some sketch points to Nav. Given that, I was ready to see what the reaction would be if I put someone else into the lead. I had plenty of time to evaluate before the switch and I would consider the replies/reactions it garnered "real". It may not be your choice of strategy, but that doesn't mean I didn't do it with purpose
Click to expand...
Nah, I never knock strategy if it is something that works well for someone. And I forgot even that I was the first one just knew it seemed like you hadn't actually questioned the person in the lead but switched. Which matches because our interactions only started after I voted you. heh
 
Lupin21 said:
Nah, I never knock strategy if it is something that works well for someone. And I forgot even that I was the first one just knew it seemed like you hadn't actually questioned the person in the lead but switched. Which matches because our interactions only started after I voted you. heh
Click to expand...

Aha. So you admit you started it 😉
 
I like the content of the SAR/Lupin convo but leaning them both neutral for now
 
Lupin21 said:
I think for sure some of it comes down to people just going with it though. I don't think there are enough good cross examiners sometimes to allow a villager up for lynch to prove themselves. There have to be good questions asked if you are to answer in a village manner. lol
Click to expand...
How does one do this? asking for a friend
 
Coopah said:
Now this just feels unnecessary. Are you struggling to make the post count minimum or just want to look like you're contributing?
Click to expand...
And this feels like unnecessary shade. But yes, part of splitting the posts is to make sure I make the post minimum so yall will likely see a lot of that this game
 
Navilly said:
Using laughter to avoid lynches?! That’s the antithesis is what we want to see:

*********lynch MsP************
Click to expand...

Are you lynching MsP because she posted a funny gif? What do you think about SAR posting all her her gifs?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Animal Midwife
Death Nommy - Game Thread
83 84 85 86 87
Replies
4K
Views
70K
Animal Midwife
Animal Midwife
WildZoo
  • Poll Poll
Mission ImpoWWssible Game Thread
46 47 48 49 50
Replies
2K
Views
50K
chicandtoughness
chicandtoughness
WildZoo
Supernatural: Angels & Demons WW Game Thread
121 122 123 124 125
Replies
6K
Views
88K
GoSpursGo
GoSpursGo
supershorty
GGoats ThWWee: Here It GGoats Again - GAME THREAD
93 94 95 96 97
Replies
5K
Views
75K
vampyrica
vampyrica
Animal Midwife
Matrix - Game Thread
77 78 79 80 81
Replies
4K
Views
95K
samac
samac
Top