Full-Length Kaplan vs Real DAT?

Started by monch
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

monch

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hello everyone.

I just really need some opinions here. I'm taking my exam this week, and I decided to do a full-length Kaplan test. I'm falling a little short of confidence here.


I took the science and PAT portions of both the 2007 and 2009 sample tests, and my bootcamp scores were coming out pretty well.

Bio/GC/OC/TS


2007:
19/22/22/20
PAT: 22


2009:
19/19/20/19
PAT: 22


Kaplan:
🙁🙁🙁🙁🙁
14/16/17/16

PAT: 21
RC: 19
QR: 18
AA: 17


How representative is the real DAT from the Kaplan full-lengths/bootcamp/sample tests? I know the PAT is suppose to be easier on Kaplan. I'm just freaking out now.... Please help 🙁