I would like to collect data on the MCAT based around the concept of mass hysteria.
In one experiment we performed, we got a group of actors in a bus to display fake symptoms of nausea and illness and one guy to scream out there was an infectious virus spreading fast around the controlled bus.
Within 5 minutes people started claiming they had the same symptoms and were having the EXCAT same problems as the actors. This basically showed people believed in this fake virus so much that they ended up falsifying their own symtomps and getting "sick" when they were perfectly healthy...hence mass hysteria.
What does this project have to do with SDN?
I want to collect data on how many people felt the MCAT content to be difficult on their first exposure to it, versus how many people believed it was hard AFTER hearing numerous people say it was hard.
I would like to collect data on how many people felt the real exam was unexpected when they wrote it without influence from the forums and how many felt it was unexpected after influence from the forums.
So far my group has had real tests on people outside a testing center to determine how many people "felt MCAT biology was like verbal". Turns out 96% of testers who had never used an Internet med forum felt the MCAT biology was nothing like verbal while 87% of testers who use forums like SDN felt MCAT biology was like verbal (which is a popular belief here). Clearly there seems to be some influence in perception based on using online websites.
This is a side project to see if the effects of mass hysteria are more broad that simple illness but can affect everyday perceptions individuals have about events or objects.
Thanks to those who participate. Leave a commen below answering our questions and we will collect as many comments as we can for data!
In one experiment we performed, we got a group of actors in a bus to display fake symptoms of nausea and illness and one guy to scream out there was an infectious virus spreading fast around the controlled bus.
Within 5 minutes people started claiming they had the same symptoms and were having the EXCAT same problems as the actors. This basically showed people believed in this fake virus so much that they ended up falsifying their own symtomps and getting "sick" when they were perfectly healthy...hence mass hysteria.
What does this project have to do with SDN?
I want to collect data on how many people felt the MCAT content to be difficult on their first exposure to it, versus how many people believed it was hard AFTER hearing numerous people say it was hard.
I would like to collect data on how many people felt the real exam was unexpected when they wrote it without influence from the forums and how many felt it was unexpected after influence from the forums.
So far my group has had real tests on people outside a testing center to determine how many people "felt MCAT biology was like verbal". Turns out 96% of testers who had never used an Internet med forum felt the MCAT biology was nothing like verbal while 87% of testers who use forums like SDN felt MCAT biology was like verbal (which is a popular belief here). Clearly there seems to be some influence in perception based on using online websites.
This is a side project to see if the effects of mass hysteria are more broad that simple illness but can affect everyday perceptions individuals have about events or objects.
Thanks to those who participate. Leave a commen below answering our questions and we will collect as many comments as we can for data!