- Joined
- Oct 25, 2003
- Messages
- 104
- Reaction score
- 0
Actually, this kinda bugs me the more I think about it. It's only funny because there is a lot of truth to it. I feel fine about reading anesthesia-based stuff in the OR, because I think it helps me improve patient care. But what about reading novels, playing chess, surfing the 'net, etc, etc, etc?!
One of my colleagues went into the OR and just stood in the corner. The CRNA didn't notice him come in. He stood there for 15 minutes and the CRNA didn't lift his head once from his magazine. 😱 You can't tell me that's good for patient care or our image as medical professionals!
Where do you draw the line? Or is there no line?
This type of example shows you that outcome based studies in anesthesia are worthless because it is really difficult to kill people with the current anesthetics.ive walked in to relieve someone in one day surgery whose diligently working away at a crossword puzzle, look at the monitor, patients pressure is 70s systolic, the gas is set to 2.5 MAC and been told, oh, that just dropped right now, itll come right back up, and i ask does this 70 yr old really need that much agent? and i get a nonchalant "ya the patients comfortable there".. at which point i dont bother asking why a 60kg pt needs 850ml TV... 🙄 its super scary sometimes....
Actually, this kinda bugs me the more I think about it. It's only funny because there is a lot of truth to it. I feel fine about reading anesthesia-based stuff in the OR, because I think it helps me improve patient care. But what about reading novels, playing chess, surfing the 'net, etc, etc, etc?!
One of my colleagues went into the OR and just stood in the corner. The CRNA didn't notice him come in. He stood there for 15 minutes and the CRNA didn't lift his head once from his magazine. 😱 You can't tell me that's good for patient care or our image as medical professionals!
Where do you draw the line? Or is there no line?