- Joined
- Feb 7, 2011
- Messages
- 232
- Reaction score
- 19
So if a patient is given a ganglionic blocker like Hexamethonium, it abolishes the predominant autonomic tone: Hence SANS is abolished for vessels and sweat glands, and PANS abolished for the heart and everything else.
So how do explain the tachycardia seen with hexamethonium?
a) As predominant PANS (bradycardia) is abolished, the opposite SANS (tachy) comes into effect.
How is this possible? isnt the ganglia ( both SANS & PANS) blocked?
b) the tachycardia of hexamethonium is because the heart tends to beat at its own intrinsic rhythm, after PANS is abolished.
i know b) is the right answer, then how do we explain constipation and urinary retention etc with hexamethonium? 🙁
So how do explain the tachycardia seen with hexamethonium?
a) As predominant PANS (bradycardia) is abolished, the opposite SANS (tachy) comes into effect.
How is this possible? isnt the ganglia ( both SANS & PANS) blocked?
b) the tachycardia of hexamethonium is because the heart tends to beat at its own intrinsic rhythm, after PANS is abolished.
i know b) is the right answer, then how do we explain constipation and urinary retention etc with hexamethonium? 🙁
Last edited: