- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 294
- Reaction score
- 1
Do you think that generic medication is hurting the business aspect of pharmacy considering that it costs a lot just to fill a prescription?
Do you think that generic medication is hurting the business aspect of pharmacy considering that it costs a lot just to fill a prescription?
Exactly. My pharmacist told me we don't make any money off of the more expensive name brands. It makes me wonder why we bother, but whatever.You are not reimbursed based upon the price of the prescription. It's a percentage thing actually because the only thing that really changes when filling something is the cost of the prescription. You make a set amount per Rx as it starts with and the difference is mainly the difference between the cost you paid for it and what the insurance or individual pays for it.
Actually you make a lot less off of name brand drugs.
Generally you are paid off of the AWP of the drug, the dispensing fee and whatever taxes may be involved.
Something like Lipitor 40mg may cost you $140 to buy #30, which you are then paid $155 from the insurance or customer for dispensing
Something like Lisinopril 20mg may cost you $0.90 to buy #30, which you are then paid roughly $30 bucks by the insurance or the customer.
So you make $15, or 10%, off the name brand lipitor, but you can make $20 bucks, or 2,000% off of the generic.
Granted there are variations between this and the prices aren't exact, but you get the idea. Generics offer a much larger margin to gain profit than do name brands, namely because there is a sole generic manufactuer for name brand which locks in the cost.
If you really wanna know how we get screwed... well I have a recent blog post for that lol
I think it is a good business plan to carry both name brand and generics as well. You can tell the customer do you want drug X for $20/pill or drug X' for $2/pill with the same medical results. It makes the customer happy and the management happy when both benefit. The time-limit of patents also encourage drug companies to research new drugs to replace drugs they have that are on the waning side of there patent term. I think generics are a good thing all the way around.You are not reimbursed based upon the price of the prescription. It's a percentage thing actually because the only thing that really changes when filling something is the cost of the prescription. You make a set amount per Rx as it starts with and the difference is mainly the difference between the cost you paid for it and what the insurance or individual pays for it.
Actually you make a lot less off of name brand drugs.
Generally you are paid off of the AWP of the drug, the dispensing fee and whatever taxes may be involved.
Something like Lipitor 40mg may cost you $140 to buy #30, which you are then paid $155 from the insurance or customer for dispensing
Something like Lisinopril 20mg may cost you $0.90 to buy #30, which you are then paid roughly $30 bucks by the insurance or the customer.
So you make $15, or 10%, off the name brand lipitor, but you can make $20 bucks, or 2,000% off of the generic.
Granted there are variations between this and the prices aren't exact, but you get the idea. Generics offer a much larger margin to gain profit than do name brands, namely because there is a sole generic manufactuer for name brand which locks in the cost.
If you really wanna know how we get screwed... well I have a recent blog post for that lol
I think it is a good business plan to carry both name brand and generics as well. You can tell the customer do you want drug X for $20/pill or drug X' for $2/pill with the same medical results. It makes the customer happy and the management happy when both benefit. The time-limit of patents also encourage drug companies to research new drugs to replace drugs they have that are on the waning side of there patent term. I think generics are a good thing all the way around.
I find the generic names much more fun to say, personally.
They are fun, especially if you have no frickin' idea how to pronounce it.
I heard that these genetic drugs don't work the same.
I heard that these genetic drugs don't work the same.
You and every other genius patient I deal with. And it's "generic", not "genetic". 🙄
The funny thing is that the patients think that the doctor's know more about drug interaction than the pharmacists. My best friend is in D.O. school and he said he spent one semester on pharmacology...ONE semester. Unfortunately most Doc's prescribe drugs based on the drug reps that bring them lunch everyday and the generic companies don't spend their money on pens, notepads, clipboards, and other office supplies. I don't think many generic companies hire salesreps who take Dr. out golfing or give them concert tickets.Good theory, but in practice it's 50/50 whether or not the patient will see that logic.
Pioglitazone is another fun one too LOL
It matters with some meds like lamictal and it definitely matters with thyroid, levothroid vs. Levothyroxine for many people.
The funny thing is that the patients think that the doctor's know more about drug interaction than the pharmacists. My best friend is in D.O. school and he said he spent one semester on pharmacology...ONE semester. Unfortunately most Doc's prescribe drugs based on the drug reps that bring them lunch everyday and the generic companies don't spend their money on pens, notepads, clipboards, and other office supplies. I don't think many generic companies hire salesreps who take Dr. out golfing or give them concert tickets.
I have a T-shirt that says, "Your Doctor spent one semester in medical school on drugs, I spent 8."
It's good.
The funny thing is that the patients think that the doctor's know more about drug interaction than the pharmacists. My best friend is in D.O. school and he said he spent one semester on pharmacology...ONE semester. Unfortunately most Doc's prescribe drugs based on the drug reps that bring them lunch everyday and the generic companies don't spend their money on pens, notepads, clipboards, and other office supplies. I don't think many generic companies hire salesreps who take Dr. out golfing or give them concert tickets.
The even funnier thing is that doc's will fight you on that knowledge claiming they know more. Gotta love those MD egos lol
My little boy was given a presciption for an antibiotic for an upper respiratory tract infection. Went to the pharmacy and guess what, the dose was for an adult. Pharmacist caught at first glance of looking at the paper. Didn't even have to type in the info. Pharmacist know their drugs!I hear the MDs talk to pharmacists all the time like this... "If you wanted to make these calls, you should've gone to medical school."
They're still so clueless at how many interventions pharmacists catch every month, they're a huge safety net for these oblivious practitioners.
The even funnier thing is that doc's will fight you on that knowledge claiming they know more. Gotta love those MD egos lol
I remember a nurse argued with a pharmacist over something a little bit ago. Something about classes of antibiotics and how such and such isn't in the same class.
Sounds like a losing battle to me.
I feel bad for good nurses because for every one good nurse there's about 20 mentally handicapped nurses.
Seriously, what do they teach them in school?
I feel bad for good nurses because for every one good nurse there's about 20 mentally handicapped nurses.
Seriously, what do they teach them in school?
Well, from my inquiry (yes, I've made one), nurses don't learn anything medically related. Instead, they learn about "caring."
There are many well-educated and competent nurses...and there are many that are subpar. I find that the nurses in critical care areas are the most knowledgeable, but there are definitely nurses I would refuse to let "care" for me LOLOLOL