S salamanda Full Member 10+ Year Member Joined Dec 15, 2008 Messages 55 Reaction score 0 Jan 11, 2009 #1 ??? Members don't see this ad. Last edited: Apr 22, 2009
joonkimdds Senior Member 10+ Year Member 15+ Year Member Joined Jun 30, 2005 Messages 2,780 Reaction score 2 Jan 11, 2009 #2 A>a W>w AAWW is testcrossed with aaww phenotype result all AW thus all got colors and sexy. get MSN messenger Upvote 0 Downvote
A>a W>w AAWW is testcrossed with aaww phenotype result all AW thus all got colors and sexy. get MSN messenger
S salamanda Full Member 10+ Year Member Joined Dec 15, 2008 Messages 55 Reaction score 0 Jan 11, 2009 #3 r Last edited: Apr 22, 2009 Upvote 0 Downvote
joonkimdds Senior Member 10+ Year Member 15+ Year Member Joined Jun 30, 2005 Messages 2,780 Reaction score 2 Jan 11, 2009 #4 salamanda said: Woah...thanks for the FAST reply. Are you sure about that Joon? Isn't it Aa Wxwx testcrossed? Click to expand... oh oh oh yeah hold on sec, bathroom AaWW test crossed with aaww Aa x aa = 1:1 ratio between dominant and recessive WW x ww = all dominant so 50:50 between color waxy and noncolor waxy Upvote 0 Downvote
salamanda said: Woah...thanks for the FAST reply. Are you sure about that Joon? Isn't it Aa Wxwx testcrossed? Click to expand... oh oh oh yeah hold on sec, bathroom AaWW test crossed with aaww Aa x aa = 1:1 ratio between dominant and recessive WW x ww = all dominant so 50:50 between color waxy and noncolor waxy
S salamanda Full Member 10+ Year Member Joined Dec 15, 2008 Messages 55 Reaction score 0 Jan 11, 2009 #5 s Last edited: Apr 22, 2009 Upvote 0 Downvote
S salamanda Full Member 10+ Year Member Joined Dec 15, 2008 Messages 55 Reaction score 0 Jan 11, 2009 #6 bbb Last edited: Apr 22, 2009 Upvote 0 Downvote
joonkimdds Senior Member 10+ Year Member 15+ Year Member Joined Jun 30, 2005 Messages 2,780 Reaction score 2 Jan 11, 2009 #7 I am online almost all the time. Upvote 0 Downvote
joonkimdds Senior Member 10+ Year Member 15+ Year Member Joined Jun 30, 2005 Messages 2,780 Reaction score 2 Jan 11, 2009 #8 salamanda said: why isn't there WxWx? Sorry, i'm super dumb at genetics. Click to expand... first of all, ignore x. We can just talk about W vs. w WW x ww = Ww, Ww, Ww, Ww. Since W is dominant over w, it will have W phenotype. Upvote 0 Downvote
salamanda said: why isn't there WxWx? Sorry, i'm super dumb at genetics. Click to expand... first of all, ignore x. We can just talk about W vs. w WW x ww = Ww, Ww, Ww, Ww. Since W is dominant over w, it will have W phenotype.
S salamanda Full Member 10+ Year Member Joined Dec 15, 2008 Messages 55 Reaction score 0 Jan 11, 2009 #9 I got it thanks. hahah... Upvote 0 Downvote