- Joined
- Nov 16, 2006
- Messages
- 671
- Reaction score
- 2
sigh...
Looks like someone's got a dumbell comin' his way.
sigh...
Looks like someone's got a dumbell comin' his way.
good one.Looks like someone's got a dumbell comin' his way.
good one.
youll probably get a dumbell tooPlease keep the pre-med pissing contests to the pre-med forum.
youll probably get a dumbell too
It's not being AOA that strictly gives you a leg up, but if you are AOA, you're more likely to destroy the Step 1 and reap the benefits of that as well.
I think his point was that the good grades that you need in order to get into AOA may actually be what's more useful when you apply for residency than the actual AOA status.Actually, AOA is usually chosen AFTER you have taken Step 1. Thus, if anything your Step 1 score may influence whether you get AOA.
Actually, AOA is usually chosen AFTER you have taken Step 1. Thus, if anything your Step 1 score may influence whether you get AOA.
But not all schools consider Step 1 for AOA. So depending on where you're at, it may not matter.
Actually, AOA is usually chosen AFTER you have taken Step 1. Thus, if anything your Step 1 score may influence whether you get AOA.
Slightly off topic but I was wondering if affirmative action was applied to things like AOA and residency matches.
Slightly off topic but I was wondering if affirmative action was applied to things like AOA and residency matches.
Matches would seem like a valid place to have a URM slideing scale.
Slightly off topic but I was wondering if affirmative action was applied to things like AOA and residency matches.
On a side note, I don't think it's really a problem anyway - medical school admissions do a good job of creating diverse classes which invariably leads to a diverse population of MDs.
If by diverse, you mean the token Indian-girl clique, then you would be correct.
You just need to find out at your school exactly what goes into AOA...
Easier said than done. At my school (and probably most) it is largely a mystery what they are actually basing the decision on, hence the varied opinions of the responders in this thread.
Looks like someone's got a dumbell comin' his way.
Several people have commented that medical school is a lot more competitive than undergrad, which makes sense considering the average matriculating medical student came out of college with a 3.5GPA and good MCAT scores and therefore represents a higher average caliber of student.
In your experience to what extent has this been the case, especially at top schools where everyone comes in with 3.8's and 33+ MCAT scores? And would that almost suggest that going to a medical school with a less competitive class would be beneficial to make you stand out, get AOA, and honors, and thus get the residency of your choice?
Forgive my ignorance but how does the match exactly work? That is, say you wanted to do derm or rads, and tried to match into those programs, what if you didn't match into any residency of your top choice? Do you simply not match and have to wait until the next year? Or would you try to match in one specialty but also have the possibility of matching into another?
Forgive my ignorance but how does the match exactly work? That is, say you wanted to do derm or rads, and tried to match into those programs, what if you didn't match into any residency of your top choice? Do you simply not match and have to wait until the next year? Or would you try to match in one specialty but also have the possibility of matching into another?
Thank you for the replies! I'll keep that in mind...I wouldn't be making a choice for that reason, I just thought it was an interesting angle to consider. I found some excellent stats for the match that helped to clarify a lot of my misunderstanding too.
It is my understanding that it's common practice for applicants to competitive fields to also interview in another "backup" specialty (IM, for instance). When it's time to rank, the applicant would rank all the (for instance) derm places he interviewed first, and the IM places after.