The Heartland Institute's official position is that the current field of climate science is wrong in their assessment of global climate data and models. I like that this author (a public policy expert, not a climate scientist by any means), self identifies as a 'climate realist', whereas, all those other buffoons are 'climate alarmists.'
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Global warming my a...
Started by urge
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion including you.You
Your article is about what the Heartland institute thinks? The same institute that is sponsored by the oil companies and the Koch brothers?
I'm clearly not going to convince how ridiculous your position is. Just look around the world at melting glaciers, decreasing sea ice extent, and rising sea water (this is VERY real. Look up what's happening already in South Florida during king tide periods). If you can't see what's around you and are being blinded by data put out by oil companies whose survival and profits are dependent on you falling for it, then I can't help you.
But here is more global warning for you:
Freezing Tokyo sees most ambulance calls for 80 years
Thousand of penguin chicks die of starvation in Antarctica breeding 'catastrophe'
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion including you.
But here is more global warning for you:
Freezing Tokyo sees most ambulance calls for 80 years
Thousand of penguin chicks die of starvation in Antarctica breeding 'catastrophe'
You’re just fu(king with us, citing these as evidence against global warming, right?
Some random thermometer reading a degree higher than usual here and there versus people dying from the cold? What do you think is more relevant?You’re just fu(king with us, citing these as evidence against global warming, right?
Some random thermometer reading a degree higher than usual here and there versus people dying from the cold? What do you think is more relevant?
Still not sure if you are for reals. But I did like the penguin article.
I'm going to pretend this whole conversation never happened and that you're really just f*ing with us.Some random thermometer reading a degree higher than usual here and there versus people dying from the cold? What do you think is more relevant?
Urge, are you a Trump supporter? You sound just like him. Really just curious.
The way I understand it is the difference between a cross sectional study, versus a longitudinal study.
Just because its cold for a few days or weeks this winter (cross section) doesn't mean the entire year(longitudinal) is gonna be on average colder. Gotta balance out all the seasons and see.
So a harsh winter can be balanced out by an average of five years where the average temperature is warmer than usual.
Just because its cold for a few days or weeks this winter (cross section) doesn't mean the entire year(longitudinal) is gonna be on average colder. Gotta balance out all the seasons and see.
So a harsh winter can be balanced out by an average of five years where the average temperature is warmer than usual.