-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Step I Glojan pathology difference
Started by daact
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
RR is better, simply because it is more up-to-date than the Stars book. However, for pure basic knowledge, either will suffice. Some of the material in RR is definitely more current, and I think the book is an easier read.
Idiopathic said:
Are you saying you read Goljan's RR during your 2nd year pathology course?
Yes, our class used the notes from his initial RR book, before it was published. Addenda and errata notwithstanding, this material was fine, and I had no need to review pathology before the exam.
Idiopathic said:
Okay, I was just checking because I knew you were a 4th year and it didn't come out until last year.
Hey, have you been using Goljan's stuff for Step 2 prep?
Pox in a box said:Okay, I was just checking because I knew you were a 4th year and it didn't come out until last year.
I guess indirectly, since I remember so much of what he said "would be on step 2". We have some lectures taped that are online but it seems like a rehashing of pathology, so I havent bothered with it.
