Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
None of them got approval for obesity until 2015 and it wasn't until the last 1-2 years that insurance would cover for that indication.Seems like it's been working real well to help the obesity epidemic
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
None of them got approval for obesity until 2015 and it wasn't until the last 1-2 years that insurance would cover for that indication.Seems like it's been working real well to help the obesity epidemic
All fair points, although obesity is much more complex than many of us are aware of.My point is more of a retort to the earlier statement about obesity having some sort of medical explanation that makes it ok to eat a bag of Oreos in one sitting.
It's not ok to eat yourself to 400lbs.
Popping a pill to lose weight doesnt undo whatever self destructive behaviour you have that made you eat like that. That's self hate or something else that manifest in other ways that also shorten your life...
Its a very serious disorder that I just don't think will go away by simply losing weight. There must be more in it. Eating to 400lbs is a massive problem
Thats my point...
All fair points, although obesity is much more complex than many of us are aware of.
That being said, if we have a medication that makes people lose weight despite their bad habits it is still 100% worth it given how bad obesity is for people and how expensive it is to treat the complications of obesity.
We have medications to help opioid addiction and alcohol addiction. Why should this be any different?
I was talking to a urologist who treats obesity - and he says these drugs cause too much pancreatitis to be used at the rate that they are being used.i wonder how long patients will be able to tolerate it before some untoward side effect makes them stop. will this be another 6 month fad and then regain all the weight on the rebound? that is my suspicion. no one really loses weight and the drug company makes out great. i truly hope not but it has been a struggle with similarly intended medicines in the past
Your friend prescribes the b-HCG diet to his patients? Does he also have a flip phone and drive a car without power windows? I haven't heard of anyone actually recommending it in years.I was talking to a urologist who treats obesity - and he says these drugs cause too much pancreatitis to be used at the rate that they are being used.
He uses b-HCG...says it works very well for weight loss. I had never heard of that.
Good point. Never thought of it this way.All fair points, although obesity is much more complex than many of us are aware of.
That being said, if we have a medication that makes people lose weight despite their bad habits it is still 100% worth it given how bad obesity is for people and how expensive it is to treat the complications of obesity.
We have medications to help opioid addiction and alcohol addiction. Why should this be any different?
Why is a urologist treating pancreatitis (<1% on the phase 3 studies of wegovy)? You'd think he be more worried about aki, another rare complication that shouldn't deter people from using them...I was talking to a urologist who treats obesity - and he says these drugs cause too much pancreatitis to be used at the rate that they are being used.
He uses b-HCG...says it works very well for weight loss. I had never heard of that.
He's a shyster if he claims HCG does **** allI was talking to a urologist who treats obesity - and he says these drugs cause too much pancreatitis to be used at the rate that they are being used.
He uses b-HCG...says it works very well for weight loss. I had never heard of that.
Meh, I've not been impressed with Rybelsus so far - for diabetes or weight loss.Pfizer has an ORAL version with similar weight-loss efficacy. It is in phase three clinical trial. For SDN investors who missed Novo Nordisk bandwagon, it may not be a bad idea to look into pfizer.
The stock price low, dividend good. Has a lot cash from covid vaccine to buy other companies, get RSV vaccine going, and now the weight loss drug.
It's been a hot topic on the ASA Community forum.I heard the asa is working on guidelines. Not sure when it’s coming out.
www.apsf.org
Not even remotely helpful.![]()
Are Serious Anesthesia Risks of Semaglutide and Other GLP-1 Agonists Under-Recognized? Case Reports of Retained Solid Gastric Contents in Patients Undergoing Anesthesia
Glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor agonists are an emerging and increasingly popular class of medications used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and, more recently, obesity. Since the expansion of approved uses to include...www.apsf.org
Hot off the press
Though doesn’t say what to do.
![]()
Are Serious Anesthesia Risks of Semaglutide and Other GLP-1 Agonists Under-Recognized? Case Reports of Retained Solid Gastric Contents in Patients Undergoing Anesthesia
Glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor agonists are an emerging and increasingly popular class of medications used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and, more recently, obesity. Since the expansion of approved uses to include...www.apsf.org
Hot off the press
Though doesn’t say what to do.
Thought multiple are working on oral forms?Pfizer has an ORAL version with similar weight-loss efficacy. It is in phase three clinical trial. For SDN investors who missed Novo Nordisk bandwagon, it may not be a bad idea to look into pfizer.
The stock price low, dividend good. Has a lot cash from covid vaccine to buy other companies, get RSV vaccine going, and now the weight loss drug.
None of them got approval for obesity until 2015 and it wasn't until the last 1-2 years that insurance would cover for that indication.
We've known it has that benefit for diabetics for several years now. Not a shock it does it in non-diabetic obese people as well.More indications.
![]()
Novo's Wegovy shows heart benefit alongside weight loss in trial
Wegovy maker Novo Nordisk said on Tuesday a large study had shown the highly effective obesity treatment also had a clear cardiovascular benefit, boosting the Danish company's hopes of moving beyond its image as a lifestyle drug.www.reuters.com
We've known it has that benefit for diabetics for several years now. Not a shock it does it in non-diabetic obese people as well.
You spelled gastroenterology wrong four whole times there.How nasty, slimy, unethical, and frankly criminal.
This is idiotic.Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles.
Our private practice group has made it a policy that patient has to be off the drugs for at least 2 weeks for weekly dosing and clear liquid diet for at least 24 hours.
The gastric ultrasound I think would give me a false sense of security. Maybe others can comment. How reliable is it?
Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles. Would like them to switch so we can abort if there’s food during egd
I
The experts seem to think (now) that it's highly validated and reliable imo. When I finished fellowship 10 years ago it was quasi experimental.
Above video posted because I liked it.
That is problematic--these drugs are titrated to effect over a period of 3-4 months and the manufacturer states you have to start over if you are that far behind doses. They would have to have a PCP appointment to just figure out how to restart the med and a new Rx after surgery.Our private practice group has made it a policy that patient has to be off the drugs for at least 2 weeks for weekly dosing and clear liquid diet for at least 24 hours.
The gastric ultrasound I think would give me a false sense of security. Maybe others can comment. How reliable is it?
Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles. Would like them to switch so we can abort if there’s food during egd
Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles. Would like them to switch so we can abort if there’s food during egd
Wtf, I’ve never seen anyone do the colon first on a double. Is this done anywhere else? Can you tell them to do the upper first for safety purposes? I don’t see how it would matter to them.
Maybe they do it that way to avoid cancellations when they find a full stomach...Wtf, I’ve never seen anyone do the colon first on a double. Is this done anywhere else? Can you tell them to do the upper first for safety purposes? I don’t see how it would matter to them.
Our private practice group has made it a policy that patient has to be off the drugs for at least 2 weeks for weekly dosing and clear liquid diet for at least 24 hours.
The gastric ultrasound I think would give me a false sense of security. Maybe others can comment. How reliable is it?
Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles. Would like them to switch so we can abort if there’s food during egd
Both ends are gross but do the slightly less gross end first.
I think it just depends. Are they using one scope or two?
Is one scope really a thing?
Then definitively upper first.
Unfortunately we have a few older Gi docs who still insist on colonoscopy first and then egds on doubles. Would like them to switch so we can abort if there’s food during egd
Our mission is to provide students with free, unbiased information, resources, and advising for careers in the health professions. We believe every student deserves access to trustworthy guidance, regardless of background or ability to pay.