From experience, are these really that high yield (just asking)? It seems like they are more "buzzword oriented" relative to the question styles I've seen in practice tests.
Which Pathology review is better by Goljan, Rapid Review 2004 or Pathology Review - Saunders Text and Review Series 1998? Any help would be appreciated.
Do you think it is worth it to purchase Rapid Review? I take Step 1 next June, and will use QBAnk, WEbpath, NBME, and NMS for questions. Is purchasing RR worth the time in terms of quality of questions? I've read on Amazon, and it has gotten so-so reviews.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.