Goljan HY Notes

[hrtsurgeon2b]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Does anyone have the link to the 100 page high yield notes?

 

[sakullukas]

yeah

http://www.usmleforum.org/downloads/goljan_usmle_step1.pdf

good luck

 

[Mike59]

yeah

http://www.usmleforum.org/downloads/goljan_usmle_step1.pdf

good luck

From experience, are these really that high yield (just asking)? It seems like they are more "buzzword oriented" relative to the question styles I've seen in practice tests.

 

[BellKicker]

yeah

http://www.usmleforum.org/downloads/goljan_usmle_step1.pdf

good luck

High yield or not, thanks for the link 👍

 

[DOapplicant]

thank you!
i've been looking for this

 

[KBSO]

Which Pathology review is better by Goljan, Rapid Review 2004 or Pathology Review - Saunders Text and Review Series 1998? Any help would be appreciated. 🙂

 

[Idiopathic]

The RR book is similar, but more clinical and updated, obviously. It is worth the extra $$ for the new edition.

 

[TooJiggly]

The RR book is similar, but more clinical and updated, obviously. It is worth the extra $$ for the new edition.

Do you think it is worth it to purchase Rapid Review? I take Step 1 next June, and will use QBAnk, WEbpath, NBME, and NMS for questions. Is purchasing RR worth the time in terms of quality of questions? I've read on Amazon, and it has gotten so-so reviews.

- Too Jiggly

 

[HiddenTruth]

well correct me if i am wrong idio, but RR is a Q book and Path Rvw is a text in outline format, and Path is a text--eh??