Step I goljan is wrong

[peroxidase]

nutrition 2 lecture
says that proline/lysine hydroxylation by vitamin c happens in golgi apparatus

it does not. it happens in the rer

i cant take goljan to be god's word anymore

 

[lemonade90]

nutrition 2 lecture
says that proline/lysine hydroxylation by vitamin c happens in golgi apparatus

it does not. it happens in the rer

i cant take goljan to be god's word anymore

Lol at the thread title. Almost any resource will have errors or be incomplete, particularly if they are about 10 or so years old.

That being said...you should check out Goljan's most recent word...aka his Biochem RR...it does not have the mistake you claim he makes in the lecture.

 

[Phloston]

I've only listened to about half of the lectures, but I've found them to be fairly good. He's actually corrected himself in future lectures btw, saying stuff along the lines of "you guys were really nice for not jumping out at me and saying how ******ed I was for making that mistake the other day. I meant to say [this], not [that]. That was ******ed of me the other day."

Human is human (presumably).

 

[Alvarez13]

nutrition 2 lecture
says that proline/lysine hydroxylation by vitamin c happens in golgi apparatus

it does not. it happens in the rer

i cant take goljan to be god's word anymore

Nope. All textbooks, research papers, and wiki are wrong. Goljan is the only one correct on this.

Please send him an apology. Maybe he'll only take off a finger or two instead of your head.

 

[JackShephard MD]

nutrition 2 lecture
says that proline/lysine hydroxylation by vitamin c happens in golgi apparatus

it does not. it happens in the rer

i cant take goljan to be god's word anymore

I think Goljan is teaching you a method, a thought process. If you're using goljan for minutia you're doing the wrong thing.

I've only listened to about half of the lectures, but I've found them to be fairly good. He's actually corrected himself in future lectures btw, saying stuff along the lines of "you guys were really nice for not jumping out at me and saying how ******ed I was for making that mistake the other day. I meant to say [this], not [that]. That was ******ed of me the other day."

Human is human (presumably).

He's talking about complex pathological mechanisms often from memory, so I'd expect there to be occasional errors. Look at First Aid. They are writing the 30th (?) edition of their book (with ~85% of the same info) and they manage to make hundreds of errors.

 

[Wheatley]

Look at First Aid. They are writing the 30th (?) edition of their book (with ~85% of the same info) and they manage to make hundreds of errors.

I attribute this more to incompetence and knowing you have the market by the balls.

 

[Phloston]

I attribute this more to incompetence and knowing you have the market by the balls.

That's probably the most legit statement I've ever read on SDN.