I had never heard of "Pathoma " till my last thread. Which would be better to use, Goljan Pathology or Pathoma? Also with Pathoma, is it better to just get the book, or book and lecture videos?
Thanks
Pathoma is also much quicker to get through while still covering what you need to know. He leaves out a lot of the Step 2 info that Golijan touches on.
Pathoma is also much quicker to get through while still covering what you need to know. He leaves out a lot of the Step 2 info that Golijan touches on.
don't do goljan if you haven't used it yet. It may be great but its not that time effective to start at the dedicated board studying time. Make sure you understand EVERYTHING in Pathoma. I studied it so much that I could hear his voice during my exam saying THIS IS THE ANSWER IDIOT PICK IT.
I had never heard of "Pathoma " till my last thread. Which would be better to use, Goljan Pathology or Pathoma? Also with Pathoma, is it better to just get the book, or book and lecture videos?
Thanks
I really liked Goljan RR, but for someone who is retaking step 1 you should probably do Pathoma. I think you'll really benefit from having someone talk you through the material. Also Goljan is pretty annoying as a person. Sattar is a baller. I'd rather give my $$ to Sattar