I had never heard of "Pathoma " till my last thread. Which would be better to use, Goljan Pathology or Pathoma? Also with Pathoma, is it better to just get the book, or book and lecture videos?
Thanks
Thanks
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Step I Goljan or Pathoma
Started by Southern Dr
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
The books and the lectures come together, you can't buy one with out the other.
In terms of which one to use, the pathoma thread has a lot of pros and cons for both that you can read through and decide.
In terms of which one to use, the pathoma thread has a lot of pros and cons for both that you can read through and decide.
I already have Goljan, so in your opinion do you think Goljan is just as good, or should I also invest in getting Pathoma as well?
Get Pathoma, read the chapters, watch the lectures and ANNOTATE into the Pathoma book, then complement with RR+FA.
Southern Dr. you should try Pathoma, the video lectures are amazing at explaining some complex topics that I just couldn't understand with Goljan.
don't do goljan if you haven't used it yet. It may be great but its not that time effective to start at the dedicated board studying time. Make sure you understand EVERYTHING in Pathoma. I studied it so much that I could hear his voice during my exam saying THIS IS THE ANSWER IDIOT PICK IT.
I really liked Goljan RR, but for someone who is retaking step 1 you should probably do Pathoma. I think you'll really benefit from having someone talk you through the material. Also Goljan is pretty annoying as a person. Sattar is a baller. I'd rather give my $$ to Sattar
