okay, with all this talk about the side notes in Goljan's RR path I was thinking it would be really nice to have all of the side notes typed up in one place. Before I reinvent the wheel and type everything up myself, has anybody done that already and would be willing to share?
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I Goljan side notes
Started by hardy
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Good idea, but if you have the book, it might just be a good idea to look at it in there. You can see pictures and read about something if you don't understand it. Just a thought
I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea, but what is wrong with the side notes as they already are in the book? And then you can look at the pictures along with the notes. If you just want the side notes in a document, you might be better off just downloading his lecture notes since it would save a lot of time and is supposedly relatively similar.
Good idea, but if you have the book, it might just be a good idea to look at it in there. You can see pictures and read about something if you don't understand it. Just a thought
ok, beat me to it.
Flipping through 650+ pages just takes way longer than reading them all together. This would obviously be something you do after looking at them in the book first, just to remind you about all the facts right before the exam.
I have his lecture notes but thought the side notes would be a nice additional source from what I have seen they are not that similar.
I have his lecture notes but thought the side notes would be a nice additional source from what I have seen they are not that similar.
The RR pretty much follows the audio lectures. have the 100 and 36 pg documents and i think they are what he stresses in the lectures. The side notes and boxes have been very good even for my school path exams. taking step 1 in like june so not sure how they are for that
Neither one is better than the other, it's rather personal. I have seen people who swear by either book who only used one or the other that got very high scores. I think both have sufficient material, it's just based on the style of the book.Hey do you guys think that Goljian is better than the BRS path?
Personally, I like Rapid Review, because it's got a lot of meat and a bit more explanation to it. BRS Path is a bit more list-like, but also very good if you want a concise review of pathology with pertinent information.