- Joined
- Feb 21, 2007
- Messages
- 278
- Reaction score
- 3
what r some specialties with good hours that doesnt require the doc to be on call?
what r some specialties with good hours that doesnt require the doc to be on call?
Always going to be some trade-offs but depends on what your preference is...... 8am-5pm type hours? Certain amount of hours per week no matter the schedule? Or is no call more important? Etc....
I would like a job that has the 8-5 hours, but I wouldn't like to be on call. As a doctor, I would love to have a set schedule where I only work 40-45 hours a week
Outside of derm, those are part-time hours.I would like a job that has the 8-5 hours, but I wouldn't like to be on call. As a doctor, I would love to have a set schedule where I only work 40-45 hours a week
em?? although you couldnt work 9-5....Outside of derm, those are part-time hours.
em?? although you couldnt work 9-5....
OP your best bet is to become a secretary.
how was it insulting.........it seems far fetched to find a 40 hour/week job in almost any specialty. The average radiologist works 55 hours/week, rad onc is greater than 40....Insulting post. The question is perfectly legitimate. Not everyone defines themselves by their work/profession. Lots of people are interested in many things outside of it and see it solely as a source of honestly obtained income.
OP: derm is one. rad onc is another but it requires tons of reading and keeping up on the literature and the patients you see are probably sicker. radiology possibly. allergy immunology is also, but it will require a grueling IM residency. of these, derm and A/I enjoy lesser prestige than other fields. radiology and rad onc, however, are probably respected equally to most other fields because they're not as much of a niche and deal with all kinds of (often complicated) cases.
Other than those four, it has to be something part time or shift work. Shift work is IM or peds hospitalist or EM. Part time is potentially probably anything nonsurgical. However, know that for a lot of part-time you'll take a bigger than 1/2 cut because they have to cover your overhead and you'll still have to do full call.
I would like a job that has the 8-5 hours, but I wouldn't like to be on call. As a doctor, I would love to have a set schedule where I only work 40-45 hours a week
Please tell me you're trolling.
I don't think it's as impossible as you guys make it out to be. As far as I know, hospitalist do 12 hour shifts a few days a week (like mentioned above for EM) with little or no call. You can also join a group practice if you want to go that route.
I know a few physiatrist who don't work very many hours, probably around 40 (and they don't work very hard either 🙂)
However, the whole 9-5 thing is probably for other fields (not medicine), but you certainly don't have to work 70+ hours/week for the rest of your life.
What about EM? I heard they usually only work close to 40 hours a week, where some work three 12 hour shifts. Obviously, as a resident, you'd be working more
Yeah, true, but those shifts are at the most random times. You'll spend just as much time recovering on sleep as you spend working.
this may not be a specialty, but how about family practice? That's 9-5 Mon through Friday no weekends no call or at least close to that description.
Unless you work part time or in ED, your chances of working 40 hours a week in medicine are zero.
don't forget about pathology and ophthalmology
I might suggest NP or PA. Better hours, no call. And you'll make almost as much as a peds allergist, who still works more than 40 hours a week.
Unless you work part time or in ED, your chances of working 40 hours a week in medicine are zero. Most dermatologists or radiologists that make big dollars work tons of hours.
EM is also a lifestyle specialty to an extent but that's because it is shift based. You may work 12 hours one day have the next day off and work 12 hours the next day. You may work a few 12 hour shifts in a row but then get a few days off in a row. Not exactly sure of the specifics but that's what I get out of it.
The thing with EM is that it is shift work, but those shifts are not always desirable. Especially if you are a junior attending, in some places you will be working a lot of late shifts, weekends, etc.
The one reason what gujuDoc said may still be valid is that some people consider EM a "lifestyle" specialty solely because it's shift-based work as opposed to requiring call schedules. To some people, not carrying a pager when outside of the hospital = "lifestyle specialty" regardless of the typical hours. Not saying I agree with that--I'd much prefer a typical endocrinologist's call experience, for example, over working 12-hour night shifts three nights in a row--but a lot of people seem to think that way.The thing with EM is that it is shift work, but those shifts are not always desirable. Especially if you are a junior attending, in some places you will be working a lot of late shifts, weekends, etc.
Most dermatologists or radiologists that make big dollars work tons of hours.
It is a specialty, and the only way you won't have nights, weekends or call time is if you have someone else manage your admitted patients. Just about all FP docs I've talked with stay VERY busy.
Too much talk, not enough info.
Do any of these: psychiatry, PM&R, pathology, ophthalmology, dermatology
Be prepared to work hard in med school for the latter ones. If you want to be a doctor but don't want to do the 80+ hours a week plus call you don't have to and don't let others tell you otherwise.
My father-in-law just brought in $693,000 (on his W-2) and he worked 165 days last year.
IR Neuroradiology ftw....
Law2Doc:
I'm going to call BS on your many "professionalism" pronouncements. First you were saying that engineers weren't professionals. Now you're saying that doctors essentially can't work less than 60 hours a week.
.
The two are unrelated discussions. There are multiple definitions of "professional" out there, and I was arguing that by some definitions, engineering doesn't fit. But that's irrelevant to the current discussion.
It is naive to go into a profession where the AVERAGE hours are about 60 hours a week and say "I want to work 9 to 5". That's being unrealistic. I'm not saying folks can't work less than 60 hours a week. I'm saying that most don't, because the opportunities for this that don't undermine your career or salary aren't that plentiful. I'm not saying I or anybody "wants" to work 60-80 hours per week. I'm saying that this is a profession where the norm is to work long hours, and so you are going to be looking for the exception, not the rule if you want to work less. This is so the case that I'd suggest that if working a very normal 9-5 lifestyle is that important to you, then this is a very bad path. I'm not saying some people don't manage to get that unique manageable position, or that we all can't find a few anecdotal examples of this. Just saying it isn't the norm and a lot of folks are downplaying how hard/unrealistic this is going to be to make it happen.
The person who only wants to work 9-5 is rarely the person that puts in the kind of effort it takes to land derm. ED is not for everybody, and I was just talking to an ED doc who said there is often a large exodus from the field because too many people go into ED for the cush hours and don't realize that it has a lot of undesirable overnight shifts and that if you don't enjoy something, doing it in 3-4 shifts a week doesn't really make it more palatable. Probably the same can be said for any lifestyle field.
I think there's a difference between "putting your career first" and tanking it. You have to strike a balance, and in medicine, you are going to be very hard pressed to find a combo of short hours that doesn't derail your career very significantly. I think a lot of people would work shorter hours if it didn't take them totally off track for future career development, but in most cases it doesn't work that way. You either choose a dead end lower paying path with more free time, or you keep a career progression going but have to work a bit longer than you'd like. It's true in most professional fields and definitely true in medicine.
I was logged close to 80 hours a week on a vascular surgery service, and that was a cakewalk when compared to a month of logging 55 hours a week for EM.
Pathology, anesthesia, ophtho, derm, rads, psych, and PM&R can all have 40 hour work weeks pretty easily. ...
Agree with rads and gas being longer hours. They are known for their controllable schedules than a short work week. Do have to say that matching into psych should be easy for most US seniors. Path, gas, and PM&R are also well within the range of the majority of US grads.Not true for all of these. The average hours for both rads and gas are 60 hours per week. The others all average closer to 50. And a lot of these averages are bolstered by older, semi-retired physicians who are parts of a pared down business plan model that no longer exists for the current generation. There are definitely a handful of places that are well below average, as well as some part time options (particularly in psych, peds), but you are kidding yourself if you say you can come by these slots "pretty easily". They are progressively becoming hard fought (due to increased lifesyle focus of the current generation), or they come with a significant hit to career progression/salary.
Insulting post. The question is perfectly legitimate. Not everyone defines themselves by their work/profession. Lots of people are interested in many things outside of it and see it solely as a source of honestly obtained income.
Why is that an insulting post? I don't know too many secretaries that are on call at night or on the weekends. Fact of the matter is that they work 8-5 jobs.Insulting post. The question is perfectly legitimate. Not everyone defines themselves by their work/profession. Lots of people are interested in many things outside of it and see it solely as a source of honestly obtained income.
OP: derm is one. rad onc is another but it requires tons of reading and keeping up on the literature and the patients you see are probably sicker. radiology possibly. allergy immunology is also, but it will require a grueling IM residency. of these, derm and A/I enjoy lesser prestige than other fields. radiology and rad onc, however, are probably respected equally to most other fields because they're not as much of a niche and deal with all kinds of (often complicated) cases.
Other than those four, it has to be something part time or shift work. Shift work is IM or peds hospitalist or EM. Part time is potentially probably anything nonsurgical. However, know that for a lot of part-time you'll take a bigger than 1/2 cut because they have to cover your overhead and you'll still have to do full call.
The one reason what gujuDoc said may still be valid is that some people consider EM a "lifestyle" specialty solely because it's shift-based work as opposed to requiring call schedules. To some people, not carrying a pager when outside of the hospital = "lifestyle specialty" regardless of the typical hours. Not saying I agree with that--I'd much prefer a typical endocrinologist's call experience, for example, over working 12-hour night shifts three nights in a row--but a lot of people seem to think that way.
That said, we all know that if the OP is serious medicine is not his best bet.
Good hour specialties or lifestyle specialties include Rads, Derm, to an extent Rad Onco. These 3 being some of the most competitive because they are both high paying and lower hours.