- Joined
- Jan 1, 2012
- Messages
- 366
- Reaction score
- 29
- Points
- 4,721
- Medical Student
How do you know the difference?
Look at their match results.How do you know the difference?
How do you know the difference?
I like this!Look at their match results.
Interesting thought.I was actually thinking about this the other day - maybe one metric you could use would be Step 1 pass rate? I know there's a big difference between schools that "teach to the test" vs. others that expect students to self direct their step 1 studying - that's why you wouldn't look at average score. Of course, across the board pass rates are going to be quite high, but there's probably a meaningful difference between a school that consistently has a 98% pass rate vs one that is consistently at 93% (you'd have to look at a 5-year rolling average at least). Even if this is useful, it would still just be one data point in a larger picture. There are of course many other important factors to consider that vary from applicant to applicant.
Thoughts?
Interesting thought.
However, I would like to say that a school's match list is more important than their average USMLE scores or their USMLE pass rates. I personally believe a school's match list is a testament to the student body's academic performance AND the school's reputation and connections with the medical world.
But almost everyone knows the best residencies are at Yale-New Haven, MGH, and Hopkins. In general, if you have fewer, if any, students matched into these highly competitive residencies, then it's probably not as resourceful as a school that did have several who matched into these specialties. Obviously there are exceptions. But let's put SUNY Downstate against NYU. Same location but NYU probably has a more impressive match list.Is it a licensed medical school? Then it's good. It might be hard to imagine before interviewing (I thought so) but once you get to tour and interview at places I feel like you can get a good sense of what the student body is like there. You want to go somewhere where you have the resources to succeed. To those that want to do research, that means a research school, others want a strong support group (family) nearby. Pretty much every school has high Step 1 pass rates and average Step 1 scores. Also, match lists only tell you where students matched, not if that was their desired spot. The best medical school is the one you get accepted to and will allow you to pursue your own interests in medicine.
As someone with immediate family on med school faculty, it's definitely not this simple. I largely agree with the rest of what you've said though.Is it a licensed medical school? Then it's good. It might be hard to imagine before interviewing (I thought so) but once you get to tour and interview at places I feel like you can get a good sense of what the student body is like there. You want to go somewhere where you have the resources to succeed. To those that want to do research, that means a research school, others want a strong support group (family) nearby. Pretty much every school has high Step 1 pass rates and average Step 1 scores. Also, match lists only tell you where students matched, not if that was their desired spot. The best medical school is the one you get accepted to and will allow you to pursue your own interests in medicine.
Would you say whether a med school is "good" largely depends on the geographic region you are surveying? University of North Dakota SOM may be the best med school in the US to North Dakotans. Similarly, any of the Texas schools may be the "best" med school in the US to Texans. Obviously the Harvards and Hopkins of the world at the best everywhere but would you say that for smaller/less prestigious med schools, they would be regarded as "the best" med school in their region or state by their own people?As someone with immediate family on med school faculty, it's definitely not this simple. I largely agree with the rest of what you've said though.
But almost everyone knows the best residencies are at Yale-New Haven, MGH, and Hopkins. In general, if you have fewer, if any, students matched into these highly competitive residencies, then it's probably not as resourceful as a school that did have several who matched into these specialties. Obviously there are exceptions. But let's put SUNY Downstate against NYU. Same location but NYU probably has a more impressive match list.
I was actually thinking about this the other day - maybe one metric you could use would be Step 1 pass rate?
I would disagree. Step 1 comes down to an individual's test taking and studying abilities. Guaranteed every medical school curriculum broadly covers Step material whether the school "teaches to the test" or not.
That's a good point. Do you have an alternate suggestion?
+1. Through work, I've gotten to know a professor at Stanford whose spoken with me at length about med school, residency, etc. His take is that if you want to go into academics, then go for the big name residencies, where your first two years or so will be spent writing papers while the attendings do the real stuff ("MGH, Mayo, etc. aren't considered top programs because they're letting all their first years perform procedures"). If you want to be the best clinician, go to a less-reputable residency that allows you to take on a lot more responsibilities from day one. I think there's some validity to the idea.I'm not sure that's completely true. Some of the best residencies aren't at "big name" places like MGH. It depends on the specialty and the current attendings directing the program. I've heard that some "big shot" places aren't all that great with the actual teaching. BlueLabel is right in that we don't really know what programs are elite.
So how do I find data on matching results?
That's what I was going to say! 🙂All the ones that let you in are fabulous
But almost everyone knows the best residencies are at Yale-New Haven, MGH, and Hopkins. In general, if you have fewer, if any, students matched into these highly competitive residencies, then it's probably not as resourceful as a school that did have several who matched into these specialties. Obviously there are exceptions. But let's put SUNY Downstate against NYU. Same location but NYU probably has a more impressive match list.
Even if one runs the gauntlet of being in a position to actually apply to med school completed (i.e, competitive grades, MCAT, rec letters, etc), almost 60% of the applicants will not get accepted anywhere. Getting into and graduating from any US medical schools is good, period.
Look at the Results of the 2012 NRMP Program Director Survey .
You will see in above (Figures 1 and 2) that in deciding to offer a fourth year medical student an interview and whether to rank a student for a residency position the surveyed Program Directors (PD) consider it a more important factor that a student graduate from ANY US allopathic school (v osteopathic or foreign) than if someone graduates from a highly regarded US med school. I think the fact that the decision makers (PD) put more weight on a student graduating from any US med school v. a highly regarded US med school supports my argument that any US med school is good.
How do you know the difference?
The match list is worthless.
Cost of attendance.
The best medical school in the US is the cheapest one you get into.
A kid from Harvard matches a small family medicine residency in Waco, Texas. Is that good or bad? Was that kid the loser from Harvard?How is the match list worthless? That's one of the first things I look at. At first glance, it may seem trivial or even useless to evaluate a school based solely on the match, but when compared over the last few years, you start to get a feel for the quality of programs the school is capable of sending their students to.
Also, it's a useful tool to compare geographic data (schools in NYC with match to programs in New York and NE United States, regional bias, etc). For applicants who may be faced with the choice of leaving the country or choosing between DO and IMG, a school's "history" of matching could inevitably seal the deal.
But almost everyone knows the best residencies are at Yale-New Haven, MGH, and Hopkins. In general, if you have fewer, if any, students matched into these highly competitive residencies, then it's probably not as resourceful as a school that did have several who matched into these specialties. Obviously there are exceptions. But let's put SUNY Downstate against NYU. Same location but NYU probably has a more impressive match list.
How is the match list worthless? That's one of the first things I look at. At first glance, it may seem trivial or even useless to evaluate a school based solely on the match, but when compared over the last few years, you start to get a feel for the quality of programs the school is capable of sending their students to.
but hey, they know better than a medical student/resident/attending. they know what's really important.This whole "you can't really evaluate a school based on the match list" song and dance happened like a week ago in another thread. It will come up again next week. In all these threads, it will premeds looking at match lists and med students saying that doing so isn't helpful.
But almost everyone knows the best residencies are at Yale-New Haven, MGH, and Hopkins. In general, if you have fewer, if any, students matched into these highly competitive residencies, then it's probably not as resourceful as a school that did have several who matched into these specialties. Obviously there are exceptions. But let's put SUNY Downstate against NYU. Same location but NYU probably has a more impressive match list.
Having done all my clinical experiences at Yale-New Haven and affliated clinical sites, I really hope this is not true. And even if it is, that's still not a sufficient reason to go to New Haven. The city is literally the worst I have ever lived in.
lmao is it really that bad
That's a good point. Do you have an alternate suggestion?
Do you see anything wrong with that ranking?http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools
I'm surprised no one brought up this website. Having said that, is there something wrong with how schools are ranked on this website?
Didn't you say the same of NYCHaving done all my clinical experiences at Yale-New Haven and affliated clinical sites, I really hope this is not true. And even if it is, that's still not a sufficient reason to go to New Haven. The city is literally the worst I have ever lived in.
Do you see anything wrong with that ranking?
Or do you think things like number of publications per faculty member is an important measure of how good a school is?