Good read

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Enkedu

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
BMJ 2002;324:819-823 ( 6 April )

Primary care
Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors

Sue Horrocks, research associate, a Elizabeth Anderson, senior lecturer, b Chris Salisbury, consultant senior lecturer. a

a Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, b Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of West of England, Bristol BS16 1DD

Correspondence to: C Salisbury [email protected]

Objective: To determine whether nurse practitioners can provide care at first point of contact equivalent to doctors in a primary care setting.

Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies.

Data sources: Cochrane controlled trials register, specialist register of trials maintained by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, science citation index, database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness, national research register, hand searches, and published bibliographies.

Included studies: Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies comparing nurse practitioners and doctors providing care at first point of contact for patients with undifferentiated health problems in a primary care setting and providing data on one or more of the following outcomes: patient satisfaction, health status, costs, and process of care.

Results: 11 trials and 23 observational studies met all the inclusion criteria. Patients were more satisfied with care by a nurse practitioner (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.47). No differences in health status were found. Nurse practitioners had longer consultations (weighted mean difference 3.67 minutes, 2.05 to 5.29) and made more investigations (odds ratio 1.22, 1.02 to 1.46) than did doctors. No differences were found in prescriptions, return consultations, or referrals. Quality of care was in some ways better for nurse practitioner consultations.

Conclusion: Increasing availability of nurse practitioners in primary care is likely to lead to high levels of patient satisfaction and high quality care.

Members don't see this ad.
 
This study sounds good at first glance, but upon further investigation (i.e. reading the entire study), I think it's mostly B.S.

This study leaves far too many variables unaccounted for. The study doesn't take patient load or types of illnesses treated into account. Of course the NP seeing 10 patients/day is going to be able to spend more time with them than the physician who sees 20+ patients/day.

Likewise, when NPs work in a family practice clinic, they see the simple cases while the physician sees the more complex patients. Of course the nurse practitioner will have better outcomes! It's a hell of a lot easier to treat a case of sinusitis than it is to treat a heart condition.

Good grief, this study makes a mockery of
science. :thumbdown:
 
What doc only sees 20 pts a day if they still want to practice?
 
Docgeorge said:
What doc only sees 20 pts a day if they still want to practice?

The kind that have 3 or 4 NPs and PAs working for/with them.
 
Top