- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
- Messages
- 17,237
- Reaction score
- 13,023
He seemed to know more about the issue of MOC than many of the others did. MOC doesn't weed out the "bad apples".Wow, Andrew Schlafly, founder of Conservapedia, was one of the debators.
He seemed to know more about the issue of MOC than many of the others did. MOC doesn't weed out the "bad apples".Wow, Andrew Schlafly, founder of Conservapedia, was one of the debators.
As a field, the ABR needs to get rid of the FMG loophole. It's such a joke.
But what makes Radiology different than other specialties with respect to wanting free labor?It's clear why it's still in place though. Gives academic departments free labor.
It's embarrassing to the field that the loophole is still open.
But what makes Radiology different than other specialties with respect to wanting free labor?
It has to be open for a damn good reason. Someone or some group of people is reaping the benefits of the loophole, and I'm not talking about the FMGs themselves. I think people in the ABR, or associated with the ABR's decision-making body, get some kind of reward (personal, political, or financial) for allowing the inflow of FMGs. It could be someone sympathetic to FMGs, is an FMG themselves, etc.As a field, the ABR needs to get rid of the FMG loophole. It's such a joke.
It has to be open for a damn good reason. Someone or some group of people is reaping the benefits of the loophole, and I'm not talking about the FMGs themselves. I think people in the ABR, or associated with the ABR's decision-making body, get some kind of reward (personal, political, or financial) for allowing the inflow of FMGs. It could be someone sympathetic to FMGs, is an FMG themselves, etc.
More likely, IMO, the ABR fears backlash similar to that seen in the UK, when their NHS said FMGs had unsatisfactory outcomes and therefore the NHS should make board exams harder to pass. They were immediately accused of racism and xenophobia.
It's just like politics you'd find anywhere else.
To my knowledge, the ABR is either the only or one of very few specialty boards that permits certification through an alternate pathway. So, if you're proposal is true, then why are the overwhelming majority of other specialty boards seemingly unconcerned about these potential charges of racism and xenophobia?
I bet the other specialty boards did not have such a loophole in the first place, or it affected them to a much lesser degree, or was closed long ago.
Since radiology is now essentially the only specialty remaining with this kind of loophole, a move to close it would bring an extraordinary level of scrutiny and criticism.
I bet the other specialty boards did not have such a loophole in the first place, or it affected them to a much lesser degree, or was closed long ago.
Since radiology is now essentially the only specialty remaining with this kind of loophole, a move to close it would bring an extraordinary level of scrutiny and criticism.
I have no idea what you're basing this on. The alternate pathway didn't exist until the late part of the 20th century when there was a shortage of radiologists. It stayed open through the boom times of the last decade because 1) jobs were plentiful and 2) traditional pathway radiologists didn't need or care to do unpopular fellowships (at the time, mammo, chest, etc.). There is no longer a shortage of radiologists and jobs are difficult to find. Even historically less popular fellowships are now competitive for traditional pathway radiologists. I see no reason why the ABR would receive any scrutiny if it falls back in line with the rest of the boards in the ABMS. Who is going to complain? IMGs who, were they in any other specialty, would have zero chance of obtaining certification anyway? In fact, it would probably be widely praised by the people that really matter - the ABR's diplomates - if water-cooler talk and online forum posts are any indication.
Totally agree with you in this case. In fact, this loophole gives preference to FMGs by not having to do a residency. Totally uncool.
Why can't the US implement an *US grad first* match thing like Canada has? Foreigners have NO claim to anything here. No one is owed anything. What is wrong with the system here?
Well, to be exact, the ABR says that the IMG must fulfill the training requirements in his/her own nation, but the variance is tremendous. Many of these radiologists are quite good. Others are not, and doing 4 years of fellowship doesn't change that.
I agree with you that it should be the same rules for everyone. If an IMG wants to be a radiologist in the U.S., then participate in the match, do an internship, and do a residency - with all of the baggage that goes along with that - just like everyone else.
Well, to be exact, the ABR says that the IMG must fulfill the training requirements in his/her own nation, but the variance is tremendous. Many of these radiologists are quite good. Others are not, and doing 4 years of fellowship doesn't change that.
I agree with you that it should be the same rules for everyone. If an IMG wants to be a radiologist in the U.S., then participate in the match, do an internship, and do a residency - with all of the baggage that goes along with that - just like everyone else.
Medical training in other countries, particularly second and third world ones, is extremely variable. For every competent British-trained doctor there are twenty incompetent ones trained in India, Iraq or the Caribbean.
I've met residents who were supposedly attending staff in their home countries. Their incompetence and lack of both insight and intelligence lead me to wonder if they bought fake degrees.
I'd go as far as saying if a foreign citizen wants to be a physician in the US, they should apply to a US medical school and start from scratch.
There was some dude who "shadowed" at our institution for months, he was foreign. He was supposedly a radiologist in his country. One day he asks me if Radiology is hard. I was like what? Aren't you a radiologist?
I think that we are doing not only our patients a disservice but our physician community one too by
1-limiting seats in medical schools
2-at the same time, allowing thousands of immigrant foreign doctors to do residency here
how does that make sense? Why not increase seats in med schools to mirror the # of residency positions? I always thought it was absolutely senseless to not do this.
Did the ***** that hung around your department get one of those fellowships?
The whole problem is that the MD by itself is useless. Residency should be optional, and an MD should be sufficient training for general practice.
The OP is accurate in his assessment.
Radiology is emotionally and financially not a good field at this point in time.
Before people post inaccurate self reported salary survey data, they should look at the real data provided.
PAY
Medicare recently released the actual reimbursement provided to each physician in the US. Please search NY time or WS Journal medicare. The only radiologists making high numbers were those that owned imaging centers and getting technical fees.
Radiologists are nowhere near the top and are below average when you compare it to the other specialties.
This is the best kept secret in medicine. The same doctors who complain that radiologists make too much money are making a multiple of radiologist's salary. As a clinician you can manipulate and upcode your services.
The average doctor spends very little time with their patients. They often can have an extender or resident do the bulk of the work. For 10 minutes time they often bill 45 to 60 minutes of time. They can code based on complexity. YES, it is very common for a internist to make 500K. Most are private.
THE REAL NUMBERS. Radiologists at my hospital had medicare reimbursements of 50-90K on average, with no one getting six figures from the government. Our ED doctors were well into the 100-200K range. We had two internal medicine doctors who had 900k and 450K as their collections from medicare. Plenty of FP and internists who made the same as the radiologists.
Look at the real number of reimbursement. A CXR pays under $10 from medicare. An ultrasound 20-35 dollars. CT 30-55 dollars. Yes a busy radiologist can read 100 a day. How about clinical medicine average new patient visit $120-180, average established patient visit $80-120. Yes, a busy FP or internist can see 30-40 patients a day. Then there is inpatient rounding...once you have the patient admitted, you can do the hi how are you rounds and get about $100 a pop.
One of my parents is a family med doctor who has done well. He makes the same as me. My brother is a surgeon. He works about half the hours and makes a little less (lots of dead time and afternoons off).
SATISFACTION
Clinical doctors control the patients and get all the credit for their care. Most clinical doctors order tests as a replacement for their physical exam. The majority of them will pretend that they in fact have interpreted the images and come to the conclusion/diagnosis. The majority of people think that radiologists are the same as x ray techs.
JOB MARKET
Right now as a medicine or FP doctor you can get a job in any city in the country without much difficulty. As a radiologist, good luck.
CALL
Most doctors have very limited call. Especially with employed status. Radiologists have increased call and coverage in the last 10 years to manage the call other doctors are giving up.
OB and anesthesia are the other people that take call, but most of it is sitting around reading, watching TV, eating, etc.
Radiologists on call are reading for 5-10 places, doing all the surgical procedures for the other doctors who are at home.
Think, thoracentesis, paracentesis percutaneous cholecystostomy, percutaneous abscess drainage, percutaneous drain for diverticulitis, appendix abscess drain, tpa for revascularization of ischemia, chest tubes, lumbar punctures. All the procedures
The majority of the procedures pay much less than for a doctor to give a zpack for a cough/pneumonia.
EMPLOYMENT
The majority of radiologists are forced to be employees because the hospital decides. The majority of clinical doctors who are employees do very little work, have a lot of time off, or take no call.
Anyhow, decide for yourself.
Lots of trolls up in here. This thread needs to be closed.
By looking at comments, these are the same people that post all day long on Aunt Minnie, and they have started banning them. SDN needs to follow suit.
$500k is average for an internist? How dumb do you think we are?
The OP is accurate in his assessment.
Radiology is emotionally and financially not a good field at this point in time.
Before people post inaccurate self reported salary survey data, they should look at the real data provided.
PAY
Medicare recently released the actual reimbursement provided to each physician in the US. Please search NY time or WS Journal medicare. The only radiologists making high numbers were those that owned imaging centers and getting technical fees.
Radiologists are nowhere near the top and are below average when you compare it to the other specialties.
This is the best kept secret in medicine. The same doctors who complain that radiologists make too much money are making a multiple of radiologist's salary. As a clinician you can manipulate and upcode your services.
The average doctor spends very little time with their patients. They often can have an extender or resident do the bulk of the work. For 10 minutes time they often bill 45 to 60 minutes of time. They can code based on complexity. YES, it is very common for a internist to make 500K. Most are private.
THE REAL NUMBERS. Radiologists at my hospital had medicare reimbursements of 50-90K on average, with no one getting six figures from the government. Our ED doctors were well into the 100-200K range. We had two internal medicine doctors who had 900k and 450K as their collections from medicare. Plenty of FP and internists who made the same as the radiologists.
Look at the real number of reimbursement. A CXR pays under $10 from medicare. An ultrasound 20-35 dollars. CT 30-55 dollars. Yes a busy radiologist can read 100 a day. How about clinical medicine average new patient visit $120-180, average established patient visit $80-120. Yes, a busy FP or internist can see 30-40 patients a day. Then there is inpatient rounding...once you have the patient admitted, you can do the hi how are you rounds and get about $100 a pop.
One of my parents is a family med doctor who has done well. He makes the same as me. My brother is a surgeon. He works about half the hours and makes a little less (lots of dead time and afternoons off).
SATISFACTION
Clinical doctors control the patients and get all the credit for their care. Most clinical doctors order tests as a replacement for their physical exam. The majority of them will pretend that they in fact have interpreted the images and come to the conclusion/diagnosis. The majority of people think that radiologists are the same as x ray techs.
JOB MARKET
Right now as a medicine or FP doctor you can get a job in any city in the country without much difficulty. As a radiologist, good luck.
CALL
Most doctors have very limited call. Especially with employed status. Radiologists have increased call and coverage in the last 10 years to manage the call other doctors are giving up.
OB and anesthesia are the other people that take call, but most of it is sitting around reading, watching TV, eating, etc.
Radiologists on call are reading for 5-10 places, doing all the surgical procedures for the other doctors who are at home.
Think, thoracentesis, paracentesis percutaneous cholecystostomy, percutaneous abscess drainage, percutaneous drain for diverticulitis, appendix abscess drain, tpa for revascularization of ischemia, chest tubes, lumbar punctures. All the procedures
The majority of the procedures pay much less than for a doctor to give a zpack for a cough/pneumonia.
EMPLOYMENT
The majority of radiologists are forced to be employees because the hospital decides. The majority of clinical doctors who are employees do very little work, have a lot of time off, or take no call.
Anyhow, decide for yourself.
This makes zero sense. Sure the job market is bad right now, but some of the things being said are absurd. Don't know many internists who make 500-900K. The medicare reimbursement hardly translates to salary...
Why is it so acceptable and commonplace to bash radiology? There's a lot of crap in many, many fields but the trolling in radiology forums is far worse than anywhere else. Is it because rads was such a gold mine before? So these jaded people come on here and complain because they were expecting to pull $500k in Manhattan without working nights or weekends? Is it just a matter of perspective?
Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions, but this might be what happens when people choose a field for the wrong reasons, and their expectations are not met. Take this as a warning, medical students... $_$
Also, awesome emoticon: :troll:
Bill medicare 500k + private insurance billing - practice overhead= take home income
As I said, medicare billing correlates closely with take home salary. The more you bill the more you take home (minus practice expenses).
So, we have a three variable equation, two of the variables are unknown (in reality there are more), and your conclusion is that the known variable 'correlates closely' with the sum. Step up your game, brosef. That's C- trolling.
The average doctor spends very little time with their patients. They often can have an extender or resident do the bulk of the work. For 10 minutes time they often bill 45 to 60 minutes of time. They can code based on complexity. YES, it is very common for a internist to make 500K. Most are private.
Yes you got me. I am a troll. Things are wonderful out there. Trying to make things even less competitive for the next match. See where you will end up shark if you lose your coastal job. Aint gonna be coastal next time around and if it is you will be working 3rd shift or as an employee grunt without any stability. And I got a job but being in a field without options is a bummer. And, medicare billing has no correlation to to take home income. Yea right. Must be chatting with college students on here.
Except other specialties don't do this loophole and never had this loophole.It has to be open for a damn good reason. Someone or some group of people is reaping the benefits of the loophole, and I'm not talking about the FMGs themselves. I think people in the ABR, or associated with the ABR's decision-making body, get some kind of reward (personal, political, or financial) for allowing the inflow of FMGs. It could be someone sympathetic to FMGs, is an FMG themselves, etc.
More likely, IMO, the ABR fears backlash similar to that seen in the UK, when their NHS said FMGs had unsatisfactory outcomes and therefore the NHS should make board exams harder to pass. They were immediately accused of racism and xenophobia.
It's just like politics you'd find anywhere else.
Maybe bc at one time quite recently this was very much the case. Esp. those who went in when things were one way, and now it's different coming out.Why is it so acceptable and commonplace to bash radiology? There's a lot of crap in many, many fields but the trolling in radiology forums is far worse than anywhere else. Is it because rads was such a gold mine before? So these jaded people come on here and complain because they were expecting to pull $500k in Manhattan without working nights or weekends? Is it just a matter of perspective?
You must be seriously trolling. 10 posts, go figure. Try harder.The OP is accurate in his assessment.
Radiology is emotionally and financially not a good field at this point in time.
Before people post inaccurate self reported salary survey data, they should look at the real data provided.
PAY
Medicare recently released the actual reimbursement provided to each physician in the US. Please search NY time or WS Journal medicare. The only radiologists making high numbers were those that owned imaging centers and getting technical fees.
Radiologists are nowhere near the top and are below average when you compare it to the other specialties.
This is the best kept secret in medicine. The same doctors who complain that radiologists make too much money are making a multiple of radiologist's salary. As a clinician you can manipulate and upcode your services.
The average doctor spends very little time with their patients. They often can have an extender or resident do the bulk of the work. For 10 minutes time they often bill 45 to 60 minutes of time. They can code based on complexity. YES, it is very common for a internist to make 500K. Most are private.
THE REAL NUMBERS. Radiologists at my hospital had medicare reimbursements of 50-90K on average, with no one getting six figures from the government. Our ED doctors were well into the 100-200K range. We had two internal medicine doctors who had 900k and 450K as their collections from medicare. Plenty of FP and internists who made the same as the radiologists.
Look at the real number of reimbursement. A CXR pays under $10 from medicare. An ultrasound 20-35 dollars. CT 30-55 dollars. Yes a busy radiologist can read 100 a day. How about clinical medicine average new patient visit $120-180, average established patient visit $80-120. Yes, a busy FP or internist can see 30-40 patients a day. Then there is inpatient rounding...once you have the patient admitted, you can do the hi how are you rounds and get about $100 a pop.
One of my parents is a family med doctor who has done well. He makes the same as me. My brother is a surgeon. He works about half the hours and makes a little less (lots of dead time and afternoons off).
SATISFACTION
Clinical doctors control the patients and get all the credit for their care. Most clinical doctors order tests as a replacement for their physical exam. The majority of them will pretend that they in fact have interpreted the images and come to the conclusion/diagnosis. The majority of people think that radiologists are the same as x ray techs.
JOB MARKET
Right now as a medicine or FP doctor you can get a job in any city in the country without much difficulty. As a radiologist, good luck.
CALL
Most doctors have very limited call. Especially with employed status. Radiologists have increased call and coverage in the last 10 years to manage the call other doctors are giving up.
OB and anesthesia are the other people that take call, but most of it is sitting around reading, watching TV, eating, etc.
Radiologists on call are reading for 5-10 places, doing all the surgical procedures for the other doctors who are at home.
Think, thoracentesis, paracentesis percutaneous cholecystostomy, percutaneous abscess drainage, percutaneous drain for diverticulitis, appendix abscess drain, tpa for revascularization of ischemia, chest tubes, lumbar punctures. All the procedures
The majority of the procedures pay much less than for a doctor to give a zpack for a cough/pneumonia.
EMPLOYMENT
The majority of radiologists are forced to be employees because the hospital decides. The majority of clinical doctors who are employees do very little work, have a lot of time off, or take no call.
Anyhow, decide for yourself.
You'd be very pissed too if the salary characteristics going into a residency were one way, and then were completely different when you graduated from residency. That's not an unreasonable expectation.Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions, but this might be what happens when people choose a field for the wrong reasons, and their expectations are not met. Take this as a warning, medical students... $_$
Also, awesome emoticon: :troll:
The OP is accurate in his assessment.
Radiology is emotionally and financially not a good field at this point in time.
Before people post inaccurate self reported salary survey data, they should look at the real data provided.
PAY
Medicare recently released the actual reimbursement provided to each physician in the US. Please search NY time or WS Journal medicare. The only radiologists making high numbers were those that owned imaging centers and getting technical fees.
Radiologists are nowhere near the top and are below average when you compare it to the other specialties.
This is the best kept secret in medicine. The same doctors who complain that radiologists make too much money are making a multiple of radiologist's salary. As a clinician you can manipulate and upcode your services.
The average doctor spends very little time with their patients. They often can have an extender or resident do the bulk of the work. For 10 minutes time they often bill 45 to 60 minutes of time. They can code based on complexity. YES, it is very common for a internist to make 500K. Most are private.
THE REAL NUMBERS. Radiologists at my hospital had medicare reimbursements of 50-90K on average, with no one getting six figures from the government. Our ED doctors were well into the 100-200K range. We had two internal medicine doctors who had 900k and 450K as their collections from medicare. Plenty of FP and internists who made the same as the radiologists.
Look at the real number of reimbursement. A CXR pays under $10 from medicare. An ultrasound 20-35 dollars. CT 30-55 dollars. Yes a busy radiologist can read 100 a day. How about clinical medicine average new patient visit $120-180, average established patient visit $80-120. Yes, a busy FP or internist can see 30-40 patients a day. Then there is inpatient rounding...once you have the patient admitted, you can do the hi how are you rounds and get about $100 a pop.
One of my parents is a family med doctor who has done well. He makes the same as me. My brother is a surgeon. He works about half the hours and makes a little less (lots of dead time and afternoons off).
SATISFACTION
Clinical doctors control the patients and get all the credit for their care. Most clinical doctors order tests as a replacement for their physical exam. The majority of them will pretend that they in fact have interpreted the images and come to the conclusion/diagnosis. The majority of people think that radiologists are the same as x ray techs.
JOB MARKET
Right now as a medicine or FP doctor you can get a job in any city in the country without much difficulty. As a radiologist, good luck.
CALL
Most doctors have very limited call. Especially with employed status. Radiologists have increased call and coverage in the last 10 years to manage the call other doctors are giving up.
OB and anesthesia are the other people that take call, but most of it is sitting around reading, watching TV, eating, etc.
Radiologists on call are reading for 5-10 places, doing all the surgical procedures for the other doctors who are at home.
Think, thoracentesis, paracentesis percutaneous cholecystostomy, percutaneous abscess drainage, percutaneous drain for diverticulitis, appendix abscess drain, tpa for revascularization of ischemia, chest tubes, lumbar punctures. All the procedures
The majority of the procedures pay much less than for a doctor to give a zpack for a cough/pneumonia.
EMPLOYMENT
The majority of radiologists are forced to be employees because the hospital decides. The majority of clinical doctors who are employees do very little work, have a lot of time off, or take no call.
Anyhow, decide for yourself.
I would much rather have a job where I want to live in a decent field than struggle to find a job and move 1000 miles for a field I like. Thats just me. Plus work is work. Been doing radiology for many years and it is a job. Hard to believe for medical students that the luster and excitement will fade and become a mundane burden at some point in the future.
He prob jumped ship from AM, because they finally started banning people for this crap.Someone needs to ban this dingus.
"Been doing radiology for many years... " Gonna go out on a limb here and say that English is not your first language. What a joke.
Is this the kind of crap SDN puts up with these days?
Someone needs to ban this dingus.
"Been doing radiology for many years... " Gonna go out on a limb here and say that English is probably not your first language. What a joke.
Is this the kind of crap SDN puts up with these days?