- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 6,379
- Reaction score
- 4,361
Good riddance Nurse Ratched
I saw the movie several times, and I honestly do not think Nurse Ratched was evil - though the results of her actions certainly were. Watching the movie, I get the impression she was trying to do her best in accordance with her own understanding of psych patients and their needs. Of course, the said understanding was rather disturbed, and she should not have been allowed anywhere near a psych ward, but that is not the point. Or, maybe it is?
In other words, I do not see Nurse Ratched as the executioner and Randle as the victim. Rather, I see them both as victims of the broken system.
And, yes, I agree that it's sad that the hospital is being demolished.
State leaders decided in 2006 to build a new, $300 million, 620-bed hospital at the site of the oldest and most dilapidated part of the complex, the J Building, a yellow-painted brick structure with brown trim, a towering cupola, and iron gratings on the windows.
The front section of the building, including the cupola, will be preserved as a museum on the history of mental health care.
...
Among the 590 current patients is 44-year-old Mike Wyffels, who has been at the hospital for five years with bipolar disorder. Wyffels said he welcomes the state's plan to give most patients their own rooms in the new hospital. In some cases, he said, as many as seven patients share a room.
It seems that there is both room to provide patients with a more modernized building and to preserve some of the building for historical purposes.
This is definitely a good thing.
But those who feel too sad are welcome to try sharing a room with 6 other people in a state mental hospital. 😱
Someone needs to expand their cinematic knowledge...could you expand on this insightful comment?
could you expand on this insightful comment?
You know, I've encountered too many patients that would really benefit from long term (or life long) hospitalization and we have no such place for these poor souls today.
Is that wrong?
I think it's very wrong. My current FP attending has a strong interest in psychiatry and we were talking about the fact that after many of the state psychiatric hospitals shut down, the number of homeless in Mi increased quite a bit. The powers that be said that there would be outpatient resources made available to many of the former residents of the inpatient hospital, but that didn't seem to be enough.🙁
Agree with both of you. In a perfect world there would be enough compassionate adult foster care for all those who need it. But so many of our frequent flyers really cannot function in the "real world"...a well-run sanitarium would be a blessing.
You know, I've encountered too many patients that would really benefit from long term (or life long) hospitalization and we have no such place for these poor souls today.
Is that wrong?
Why is it that we've made progress (with still further progress needed) with other populations that can't care for themselves with respect to long term care and housing, but that same progress doesn't seem to be there for those with psychiatric illnesses? Orphanages in the US have been replaced by foster care and adoption. Nursing homes are somewhat improved from what they once were with the Eden concept and even some nursing homes becoming more home-like and less instutional. Why is it acceptable to close down mental institutions and throw the mentally ill out on the street when they can't adequately fend for themselves? Obviously the conditions of living 5 to a room, sexual abuse, assault, etc weren't good for the patients, but neither is just tossing them outside when some of them don't have the ability to provide for themselves.
So they'll be tossed out on the street- are they really that much better off in one of those depraved mental health sh*tholes you call hospitals? I'd rather see them die on the streets than locked in asylums for the rest of their lives.