D
deleted190534
well, if you put it in perspective it isn't so bad. As far as forums go, this one is extremely polite. No one has threatened murder yet-- at least that's something.
well, if you put it in perspective it isn't so bad. As far as forums go, this one is extremely polite. No one has threatened murder yet-- at least that's something.
I think people took his comment wrong, it was obviosuly a joke
Well, if you put it in perspective it isn't so bad. As far as forums go, this one is extremely polite. No one has threatened murder yet-- at least that's something.
A few thoughts.It was a joke. Not a particularly funny one, because it's not particularly original, but a joke nonetheless. It doesn't make Mark any less qualified to be a psychologist. I find the rush to judge and condemn Mark a lot more concerning than his original comment. If you practice, you are going to have patients who will value ideas or jokes that you may find distasteful or abhorrent. Your reactions would not be appropriate in therapy. If you are going to disqualify Mark from practice for making a joke (on an internet board) that would be inappropriate if made in therapy, then I assume you too will refrain from practicing.
It was a joke. Not a particularly funny one, because it's not particularly original, but a joke nonetheless. It doesn't make Mark any less qualified to be a psychologist. I find the rush to judge and condemn Mark a lot more concerning than his original comment. If you practice, you are going to have patients who will value ideas or jokes that you may find distasteful or abhorrent. Your reactions would not be appropriate in therapy. If you are going to disqualify Mark from practice for making a joke (on an internet board) that would be inappropriate if made in therapy, then I assume you too will refrain from practicing.
it was a joke. Not a particularly funny one, because it's not particularly original, but a joke nonetheless. It doesn't make mark any less qualified to be a psychologist. I find the rush to judge and condemn mark a lot more concerning than his original comment. If you practice, you are going to have patients who will value ideas or jokes that you may find distasteful or abhorrent. Your reactions would not be appropriate in therapy. If you are going to disqualify mark from practice for making a joke (on an internet board) that would be inappropriate if made in therapy, then i assume you too will refrain from practicing.
Why did the thread ever turn to sexual assault?
The OP didn't indicate that was the direction of her BF's concerns?
Really? I don't think it was a good post at all.
I get that people were a bit over-the-top reactive to Markp's joke post. But I also get that if someone tosses crap like that around, they shouldn't be surprised when people take it poorly. This is a written internet forum and it's not possible to convey sarcasm effectively. Plus, I think that Markp is missing that some of the vitriol, at least as I perceive it, was less about the content of the joke (i.e. the attractiveness thing) than the appropriateness of making a sarcastic rape joke, especially given the content of Mark's earlier posts.
No, what I saying was that good therapists endeavor to minimize the impact that their "stuff" has in session. Stop trying to overgeneralize. I assumed that you might understand the difference between an example and a sweeping generalization.As for the future qualifications piece, Mark seems to be saying that the only time our own stuff gets mixed into therapy is when we're self-disclosing.
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. I think it's safe to say that we all have weaknesses in self-awareness. Furthermore, I am not offended, not in the slightest. Interestingly enough, some women have read this and weren't offended and others were... Some men have read this and were offended and others were not. Being female doesn't make you the arbiter of what is offensive to women any more than being gay makes you the arbiter of what is offensive to gay men. We are each the arbiter of what is offensive to ourselves but to assume that our beliefs can be substituted for the beliefs of others is a bit arrogant. Do you believe in stereotyping people too?I hope I'm reading that wrong, because that's absurdly incorrect. I do think that this post and others on the forum (about feminism, women, and multiculturalism) that I've read from Mark speak to what I perceive to be some weaknesses in self-awareness. I don't mean that to be a dig, and I realize I'm getting that from a laughably small sample of behavior, but that's my perception. But I also see some parallels to another discussion where I managed to offend a board member in a conversation about homophobia, mostly because I took the position that *I*, and not a straight person, get to decide what qualifies as offensive to gay people. I think Mark's counteroffense at being "labeled as a mysogynist," or pedantic counterarguments (the "fighting while asleep" thing) is pretty parallel to this (including emphatic statements about diverse training experiences and such).
...I only stated my height and weight
to demonstrate how desireable I am!
Um, not sure how many think I made the original remark but I'm feeling uneasy because I keep seeing my comment quoted without the original context. So, I would like to make a disclaimer: I only stated my height and weight because of psych cavy's remark wondering if how many of us fit that 5'1" 115 lbs demographic, not to demonstrate how desireable I am!
I really didn't mean to start this huge argument with what I meant to be a light-hearted comment ._.