Graduate Medical Education (GME) Funding Cuts Propositions

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

carml

Y2K
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2011
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
Just a few months after Congress voted to eliminate graduate and professional interest subsidies for federal Stafford loans, they are now discussing a deficit reduction proposal that would cut funding for Graduate Medical Education (GME) and jeopardize residency training programs across the country. Given the current and growing shortage of physicians, GME cuts will reduce access to health care and threaten the well-being of all Americans.

The AAMC is offering medical students a quick and user-friendly electronic advocacy tool (CapWiz) that can be used to contact Congress in opposition to the GME cuts under consideration as part of deficit reduction. Various deficit reduction groups have proposed cutting Medicare support for physician training by up to 60% Most recently, President Obama called for a
$9 billion cut in Medicare IME payments.


I encourage you to visit the AAMC Legislative Action Center (http://capwiz.com/aamc/home/ <http://capwiz.com/aamc/home/> ) to send an electronic letter to your Senators and Representatives urging them to oppose GME cuts as part of deficit reduction. The pre-formatted electronic message posted on the Action Center requires only a few minutes of your time, and will use your zip code to automatically send your message to your respective House and Senate members.
 
the true healthcare crisis is taking too long.

lets get this party started
 
Cliffs: whats going to happen to my salary when I finish residency in 2019?
 
Word to the wise: if you truly care about this issue, or any issue that you believe requires contacting members of Congress, DO NOT SEND AN E-MAIL.

Get your congressman/womans phone number; call them; leave a message. Why? Their offices are required to transcribe all voice mails. An e-mail, however, can be ignored. Tying up their staff with transcription duties is a great way to grab their attention.
 
No matter how you choose to contact you reps, please do so. Our future is in jeopardy.
 
This will never happen in a million years.
 
It's already happening on state levels (see TX).

In today's economic climate, this is very much a reality on a federal level.

Could you elaborate a bit? Haven't heard about the TX situation.

But I'd buy that rather inconsequential cuts could make it through for political reasons, I'm just doubtful any changes would actually jeopardize GME significantly. One day, capitol hill is clamoring for more primary care GME spots, and the next day they're proposing massive funding cuts. Meanwhile, the projected physician shortage numbers seem to get larger with each mention in the media... I guess a paradigm shift just seems unlikely to me.
 
Could you elaborate a bit? Haven't heard about the TX situation.

But I'd buy that rather inconsequential cuts could make it through for political reasons, I'm just doubtful any changes would actually jeopardize GME significantly. One day, capitol hill is clamoring for more primary care GME spots, and the next day they're proposing massive funding cuts. Meanwhile, the projected physician shortage numbers seem to get larger with each mention in the media... I guess a paradigm shift just seems unlikely to me.

Didn't the Obama administration make a big deal about encouraging more people to go into primary care? So their way of accomplishing this is by first taking away our subsidized Stafford loans and then taking away residency spots. This baffles my mind. Research has shown that more primary care physicians decreases the overall cost of health care. This will actually cost our government money. I wish there were more physicians in congress, not just lawyers
 
Didn't the Obama administration make a big deal about encouraging more people to go into primary care? So their way of accomplishing this is by first taking away our subsidized Stafford loans and then taking away residency spots. This baffles my mind. Research has shown that more primary care physicians decreases the overall cost of health care. This will actually cost our government money. I wish there were more physicians in congress, not just lawyers
Exactly. No one wins by cutting GME funding except the politicians who are hell bent on reducing the deficit, which is exactly why I think most of these proposals are just political noise.
 
I don't know much, but I'm hoping this topic isn't seeing much activity because the idea of this happening is so absurd that it is likely not to happen.
 
Didn't the Obama administration make a big deal about encouraging more people to go into primary care? So their way of accomplishing this is by first taking away our subsidized Stafford loans and then taking away residency spots. This baffles my mind. Research has shown that more primary care physicians decreases the overall cost of health care. This will actually cost our government money. I wish there were more physicians in congress, not just lawyers

It's Congress, not the Obama administration coming up with these proposals. Besides, it was the Republicans who added the Stafford loan mess to the house bill.
 
I sent out my email a couple days ago when this was making its round in all the med school listservs. Got the expected generic responses from my reps, but obviously it's better than sitting around, doing nothing, and repeating the mantra of "never going to happen." It at least let congressmen know that there are some medical students who pay attention and care, and not just an invisible minority.
 
Top