- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited by a moderator:
I read that guy's post.. Phloston. He got a 279 I think. I said it in the "review materials" thread and I'll echo it here, his post was the best, most comprehensive study plan I've ever seen hands down, the dude's a real inspiration..
But I'm still happy with what I'm getting out of GT.. though at times it seems like some of the material I'm memorizing are just isolated facts that I'm never going to be tested on, I just do a little research through google/wiki (have a dedicated tab opened where I just type in the search/address box at top) about those information tidbits and it sticks and helps with the overall picture.
I read that guy's post.. Phloston. He got a 279 I think. I said it in the "review materials" thread and I'll echo it here, his post was the best, most comprehensive study plan I've ever seen hands down, the dude's a real inspiration..
But I'm still happy with what I'm getting out of GT.. though at times it seems like some of the material I'm memorizing are just isolated facts that I'm never going to be tested on, I just do a little research through google/wiki (have a dedicated tab opened where I just type in the search/address box at top) about those information tidbits and it sticks and helps with the overall picture.
I'm an M1, and I have been enjoying GT. I try to do it alongside my classes, and the daily review is not that burdensome at this point. From my experience, the purpose of GT is not meant to be a Qbank or FA. Although it sticks to FA quite well (which I really, really like), it is not FA. FA is a study source as are the Qbanks. Question banks are great for learning the question style and reinforcing some information here and there, and FA is an excellent, although extremely error ridden, review source. However, GT is so much more than a Qbank or study book ever could be: It is a study system. The point of GT is to not forget what you have already learned by constantly reviewing old and new material. By the time I get to dedicated Step 1 studying, I won't have to worry so much about having the core set of knowledge. I can focus on doing Uworld and FA, using what little dedicated time I will have to polish my skills and fact set. Overall, I believe that GT works best when used alongside classes so that information is not forgotten, and when crunch-time arrives, I'll have a couple of aces still left to play.
Lol. Really, I've heard all of this before. "Gt is much more than...." reality, if you're an M1 then you have no idea how busy M2 is. Secondly, you're not even close to 50, 60, or 70% banked. You have no idea the workload of have gt done and school. When I was an M1 with under 50% banked I agreed with all the BS you just said. Reality though is any time you put even 1 hour into studying you MUST think about efficiency. Gt isn't much more than a qbank, its much less. Having all of FA memorized before dedicated was always my goal too. You know what, that won't do much because it will take most of your time before dedicated. I know for q fact that anyone using gt could do every qbank twice I. The same amount of time. If you had done Kaplan twice, rx twice and world once before you're dedicated time you'd be better off. Much better off. You'd be studying the best stuff most often and the low yield stuff less often. Gt just focuses on what you don't know rather than what's high yield.
I understand the thought process though. And also how naive a person that isnt an m2 and hasn't come close to 75% banked or having 300 qs everyday plus new material. Plus school, lol. Funny thing is that people start saying school gets in the way of their gt actity, as if 100/100 guaranteed anything. You'll see buddy. Look, I'll make a prediction that you'll see, a lot of your M1 buddies will start dropping gt around 2 to 3 months into M2. They will just stop position here. Also watch all the m2 who still use the program. They will start asking people if they should ditch gt for qbanks because its taking all their time and they have 500 qs per day. You know how I know this? I saw it happen last year as I dilgently did my 200 qs a day.
Better yet, go back month in any point in time and read this thread. You will rarely if ever see the same peoe posting 6 months later. Why? They finally understand what I've been saying. Good luck. I won't know what you did, but I will check out this thread come summer to see if people actually stuck with gt during the last semester. Few will. And those that did, no one can really a truly argue that doing every qbank twice in the same amount of to.e would have been worse. If the guy who had 1 year and unlimited time for boards didn't use gt that should tell you soemthing.
How come not everyone received the e-mail about a mandatory December 19th migration?
What am I missing.
GT isn't that time consuming. I'm an M2 right now with more than 60% banked. I rarely have more than 200 or so questions a day. I think the key is getting your mastery % as close as you can to your banked %, otherwise you will have too many cards piled up each day.
Plus, my grades have gone up after starting GT.
Sounds good. I will check back summer time to see how you did. Good luck.
I have no horses in this race. Just hoping some M1s learn from my enormous wasted time. Qbanks are the best.
GT user here. 60% banked. The question load is becoming overwhelming (hitting ~300 per day). For the last couple months before my study period I figure I will only be able to do max 200 per day. My question is how does the "clear today's review" option work for pushing questions back daily? If the questions are added to the "end" of my daily review then I might not ever see them again. Are they added to the end? And I know we are switching to firecracker soon. How does setting the max number of questions per day work?
What I'm saying though is that I want to do this every day. So everyday I would spread them back 2 weeks. If they are added to the "end" of my daily review questions then I would never see them again. As for banking yea I went at it kind of fast but I'm really trying to see everything before my test which is coming up soon. Might switch to light mode but I have no idea how that would affect how many daily questions I get or the "yield" of the material.
Where exactly do we state our preference on what to transfer? I'm not seeing an option to do this anywhere.
Why do we need a forced migration? Disable new GT account making, let those who migrate by choice do so, and eventually, you'll phase out existing GT users...Right now, I have a study plan, and GT has been unbelievably useful for that; FC, from what I've seen, is not for me -right now-.
When I was younger, I would be excited to get home, throw my backpack aside and turn on my current favorite game (usually an RPG). I was hooked on gaining those levels and making my characters stronger, getting better equipment. Then one day, my "saved file" was erased, a file with more than 80 hours of gameplay.. lost.
Every day I work with GT, I get home, open my Macbook Air, and settle in. I open my browser and type in "Gu" in the address tab, hit right, then enter. I'm always logged on so my "dashboard" screen shows up to greet me with the questions I have for the day. I think to myself "time to gain experience points" (I know this is a bit geeky, bear with me). I do a large part of the questions relatively quickly (I rarely do all of them), then I check in on my progress by hitting my "topics" tab. Oh what a joy it is to see all those little %'s on my subjects, steadily improving day by day, week by week. Building up my % mastery for each subject is like building up my characters when I was a kid, same feeling...
please don't erase my game =(
So what happens if we select "No I do not want to transfer my data?"
Will we still be able to use GT or will the GT website be taken down and we will have no option but to start over? Will we still be able to use GT for now? And if there is a forced migration when will it happen?
I don't think this has been made clear at all - and these questions need to be answered since we have to decide by tomorrow the 19th
I'm taking Step 1 in April and in the same boat as a lot of you regarding the transfer, so I sent the GT folks an e-mail. Here are my questions and their responses:
Q: My USMLE Step 1 will be in April of this year, and I'd like to keep GT in place of Firecracker until then. If I choose to transfer all my data to Firecracker, will it still remain on GT so that I can finish out my Step 1 review there before moving on to Shelves and Step 2 for 3rd year? Or, should I simply continue with GT until Step 1 and then start fresh only with clerkship info on Firecracker once the time comes? (I have bought GT to last through 4th year...wish I'd known about the 50% off and waited!)
A: "It is not certain whether or not GT will still be up in April. There has been some discussion internally about possibly leaving GT up for the users who are taking Step 1 within the next 4 months or so. We want to bring you all over to Firecracker because it's much more reliable and less buggy and it is where all our new features and content will be. But we have to weigh that against our mission to help you all score as high as possible on Step 1. So if the disruption of forcing you off GT will compromise your score, we don't want to do it.
Follow-up Q: Thanks for the response, I really appreciate it. If I choose *not* to migrate right now (I think once I move on to Shelves/Step 2 stuff, I won't want all my original stuff on FC), would I be able to move it over if you guys end up deciding to take down GT before April? The ideal situation for me would definitely be to finish out my study time on GT (just because I'm used to it and have it all figured out), take the test, and then start with a clean slate over at FC for next year...But, of course, I don't want to get into the situation where I choose the "Do not migrate stuff" option and then GT gets taken down in March and I have nothing on FC...
A: If you choose NOT to migrate and then we end up shutting down GT before your test date we'll definitely accommodate you and pull things over at that time. No child left behind ;-)
....SO, it sounds like we can choose NOT to migrate and then, if they end up taking GT down before our boards, we can migrate our stuff over then. That said...I'm seriously hoping they hold off until at least this summer, to get the next big round of Step 1 takers through before shutting down GT and forcing the migration.
Hope that helps, guys.
Want control over how soon you see questions again in Firecracker? Now you can change this in "settings".
One of the features I liked the most about gunner training was the ability to see what % you've covered in each of the topics, as well as seeing overall % added and overall % mastery. For me (and im sure for many others), this was a metric for me to track my progress. This may seem kinda trivial, but nothing really motivated me more than seeing my % go up after adding the 5-10 cards I do on a daily basis.
I made a trial account to test out firecracker, and for me, the "flagging" mechanic just doesn't give me the same sense of accomplishment. Do you guys have any plans on implementing a % bar next to each topic like you did for GT?
YES PLZ![]()
Yes Progress bars! I mentioned it in an earlier post (the RPG gaming analogy)
Anyway, had a random thought/idea while doing review questions just now:
I think it would be cool to have an indication on the number of times we've encountered a particular question, like maybe a small red number on the bottom-left corner on the question screen.
I come across many questions I've seen multiple times, and in deciding whether or not to render it as "perfect recall", or a 4;5, I go back and forth in deciding if I can do without seeing it again.. or if I'll need to see it in a few months or so to really get it down. Knowing how many times I've encountered it would help me in deciding.
For example, if I've consistently scored a question "5" multiple times, and I see from the indication it's the sixth time I've done the question and feel comfortable with it, I'll mark it perfect recall.
Thoughts?