GW versus UMDNJ

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Les Yeux

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Oh boy, another comparison thread.

Please any thoughts on these programs would be great!
I know they're both kinda mid tier---but that's about it. 😳

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
 
Oh boy, another comparison thread.

Please any thoughts on these programs would be great!
I know they're both kinda mid tier---but that's about it. 😳

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

I've heard umdnj is big on trauma. GW on the other hand is in a no fly zone because of its location - I would suspect that translates to less trauma. So there's one aspect you can use to decide.
 
Oh boy, another comparison thread.

Please any thoughts on these programs would be great!
I know they're both kinda mid tier---but that's about it. 😳

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

I don't know anything about GW...

UMDNJ IMO is a great program.

I think most people on this thread understand that a "big name" elsewhere can mean nothing in the world of Ophthalmology. For instance, I've heard from several sources on this thread that U Chicago and Northwestern are among the least strong programs in Chicago for ophtho. That to me was surprising, but it just goes to show that the world of ophtho is its own entity. Going into this process, we don't always know such things so a lot of people apply to places that have names.

UMDNJ is not a place that has a name- yet. At least not so much outside of the East Coast. They have a well-respected Wilmer-grad PD in Dr. Langer, and have their share of heavy hitters (ie Dr. Zarbin in Retina). I think people in the know such as fellowship coordinators know about UMDNJ.
For instance, one of their seniors will be starting their Plastics fellowship next year (ASOPRS).

"Pros":
1. TONS of volume. Just tons. (I guess this can be a "con" depending on who you are). You will see everything. Their clinic is basically a free clinic with charity care, and you get people originally from just about every country dropping in. You'll definitely learn Spanish just by being there (mira ariba, etc), there will be people who drop in speaking Arabic, French, Hindi. You name it. Several African countries. And they all have the kind of pathology you thought you wouldn't see in the US. And of course Newark residents who may also have a million comorbidities and a festering problem left untreated for five years.
2. 5 residents per year for Q5 primary call first year.
3. Well-respected faculty that work closely with residents
4. Location: I guess this can be a toss-up but you are only about 20 minutes outside of NYC and you have a whole state to yourself in terms of pathology. If there is an ophtho complaint in NJ, they are sent to Newark.
5. Autonomy- a great mix of autonomy- you work up the patient and make an assessment and plan and the attending will take a look and basically let you know how they feel about that A and P. So you get that education on each and every patient you see- which to me beats working up a patient and then not even knowing what happens to them because you're already working up the next patient when the attending sees your last one.

"Cons":
1. In house call. Again, depends on who you are. But you will be BUSY on call and its better that you are in house. I believe you will get an education on call that rivals any other program in the US. You may get multiple ruptured globes in any given night. So to me this isn't so much of a con. And it's only Q5 anyway.
2. Newark. Again, NO residents live in Newark, some live in NYC I think most live somewhere in NJ. They have lots of nice suburbs and cities in NJ, some that are only a Path ride away from Manhattan.
3. YOU WILL WORK (pro or con)- I think residents looking for a "cush" program will not be thrilled here. And residents who matched here looking for a cush program are probably not too thrilled right now, but I'm just guessing. Do residents feel overworked? I don't know. A good question to ask though on interview day.

Anyway, overall it is a great program, and as I've heard on this board several times, somewhere in the top 3 or 4 NYC area programs. You won't be begging a patient with 20/30 vision to do their cataract. You'll have the volume that most other NYC programs (other than Downstate or NYEE) can only dream of. But know you will work, you will work very hard over three years. You will have clinic days with just waiting rooms full of patients. Volume. Everyone pitches in though for general clinic (will come in after their subspecialty clinic and start calling in patients and working them up, sending them on their way) and you're not travelling solo. I would put the clinical skills of someone at UMDNJ after their first year of ophtho against most second years (or even some third years) anywhere else. But you will work. Know that going into it.
 
I agree with the UMDNJ comments. I have nothing but sparkling things about this program.
 
I would put the clinical skills of someone at UMDNJ after their first year of ophtho against most second years (or even some third years) anywhere else.

Hmm, I don't know much about UMDNJ, but this poster seems to be a little biased.

That said, GW residents seem to have an excellent quality of life. They also get to do a few cataracts first year which is nice.
 
not to change the subject, just to branch for a second

anybody have any thoughts on umdnj vs vanderbilt?
 
UMDNJ, no question.
Which is better? Belgium or North Korea?
 
GW does have a cool virtual surgery machine, but UMDNJ is definitely a better program.
 
have a friend who went to GW for med school & rotated through the ophtho dept: he was not overly impressed. Dont have any 1st hand knowledge.

am a current 3rd yr resident at UMDNJ: many of the above points are correct - great volume, clinical training, attg reputation & coverage. In-house call I feel to be a positive, & you do much of your learning during busy in-house call (esp: trauma). A big plus not mentioned above is that there are no fellows here - I can not emphasize this point enough. No fellows = residents do it all. We run all clinics, do all surg cases & lasers, run all subspecialty services. When you graduate you feel comfortable doing whatever you wish.
 
As a UMDNJ medical school graduate and a PGY-3 at Jules Stein, all written above by nyeyes and ophthoapplicant are completely accurate. Its an excellent program with great faculty members.

Believe it or not, it was a very tough decision for me to leave - but I was the type looking for a busy clinical program.

In my opinion and the opinion of many I spoke to as a medical student, its the BEST program in the New York area for residency!
 
Hi all --

I'm facing a similar decision between GW and UMDNJ and was curious if anything has changed in the 4 years since this thread was written, specifically with respect to training, fellowship placement, and quality of life?

Is the consensus still that UMDNJ has the edge?
 
George Washington and UMDNJ are completely different. UMDNJ has very busy call, high surgical numbers, and lots of trauma. You will be working very hard as a resident but you'll finish your training having seen everything bad that could happen to the eye.

GW is essentially a private practice based program, where you spend a large part of your time seeing the attending's private patients. Your residency will be much easier at GW but you won't see as much. Absolutely all the trauma, emergencies, and indigent patients in the DC area go to the Georgetown/Washington Hospital Center program (maybe a small percent goes to Howard). I'm sure the GW residents become fine attendings but the program is nothing like UMDNJ
 
It's the easiest choice in the history of man, UMDNJ a million times over, unless of course you'd like to have your hand held for 3 years and run around following an attending like a puppy dog...UMDNJ is easily a top 10 residency training program in the country...
 
It's the easiest choice in the history of man, UMDNJ a million times over, unless of course you'd like to have your hand held for 3 years and run around following an attending like a puppy dog...UMDNJ is easily a top 10 residency training program in the country...

I disagree with this. Choosing a program is a personal choice. Residents at GW are exposed to a private practice setting in a less academic environment, but this may be exactly what you want if you want to enter private practice (>90% of ophthalmologists eventually do). UMDNJ will work you like a dog, but you need to show some evidence that makes you a better doctor. There is a graded autonomy system at GW and every resident I met at my interview was happy and satisfied with their training. They go on to solid fellowships and may be more productive just because they are not overworked. Choose based on personal goals, not on difficulty of the program.
 
How about umdnj vs the other ny schools? Columbia, nyeei, NYU, Cornell, mount Sinai?
 
Bumping the thread. Can any recent residents provide input on how UMDNJ (now Rutgers) compares with Mount Sinai vs NYU vs Georgetown?

Would you rate them NYEEI> Cornell
&
Rutgers >Mt Sinai > Northshore LIJ> Georgetown> NYU?
 
Last edited:
Bumping the thread. Can any recent residents provide input on how UMDNJ (now Rutgers) compares with Mount Sinai vs NYU vs Georgetown?

Would you rate them NYEEI> Cornell
&
Rutgers >Mt Sinai > Georgetown> Northshore LIJ> NYU?

Agree with the above comment about residency being a personal choice. If one program's style caters to your style or is in a location more desirable, it's 100% okay imo to rank it higher than a stronger program.

I, too, would like for someone to give their input on these programs, particularly Mount Sinai. Mount Sinai recently bought out NYEEI and they are on a trajectory to merge into the largest program in the country. Not sure when this would occur.
 
Eyeguy22, At NYEE interview, their faculty mentioned that no major changes are expected in the short term due to Mt Sinai buy-out. The time-frame when they expect significant change is 10-15 years down the line. Thus, these changes are not likely to impact our training.

Would be great to have some input from current residents and if possible, fellows from the above institutions.
 
Last edited:
Top