Personally, I don't know why this causes you to laugh incontrollably. Perhaps you can expand (and some of us might be able to explain?).
As I understand, this was decided because at OU-COM we have two curricula: the CPC and the PCC. The PCC students start anatomy right away in the first quarter with the back. The CPC start anatomy later in the quarter.
Now, both CPC and PCC start OMM at the same time. The issue was that the PCC students were exposed to the anatomy of the back before the CPC students were (paraspinal muscles, vertebral column, etc.) and therefore during OMM class, when they explained some of the techniques the CPC students were a bit puzzled by the anatomical explanations, since they weren't exposed to origins and insertions of back muscles, facet joints, etc. The administration decided to give students an anatomy intensive so that everyone is on the same page when it comes to understanding some OMM techniques.
As far as the OMM intensive, that hasn't changed. We had the intensive when we started school and it's intense, but it really goes a long way to develop your palpatory skills before the "real" OMM stuff begins. The only difference this time is that instead of having the intensive during the regular quarter, the intensive will be held together with the Anatomy intensive.
Also, many second year students are coming to school early so that they can tutor the entering students in anatomy and OMM to help ease the rigors of the Anatomy intensive.
I thought this was a good idea (trust me, the more anatomy you can learn before schools starts, the easier your life will be). If you think this is a compelling reason for you to decline your acceptance at OU-COM please let the admissions office know your thoughts. I'm sure they'll be interested.
Good luck with your future career as an osteopathic physician. You'll get an awesome education whether you attend OU-COM or CCOM.