• Bring your 2026 application questions to our open office hours with Emil Chuck, PhD, Director of Advising Services for HPSA, and get them answered live. Personal statements, secondaries, interview prep, school list strategy. Sunday, May 17 at 9 p.m. Eastern.

HARD TBR Q

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

SonhosDaVida

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
For this questions, why is it that in the Keq equation, you can ignore the numerator x? The Keq is a large value so the x will play a large role in it's value.

Question 12

1536926393409535006157622724926.jpg
15369264209218806008261655785290.jpg
 
As far as the MCAT is concerned, when you are dealing with complicated equations to solve for unknown concentrations, you can safely assume x is significantly smaller than the initial concentrations and basically ignore it completely when solving for it. This is important to save time on test day.

For this problem, if you want to be exact and not want to assume x is small, you're stuck with a scary equation of:

(1-2x)^2/((2x)^2*x) = 2.1*10^4 -->
(1-2x)^2/(4x^3) = 2.1*10^4 -->
(1-2x)^2 = 2.1*10^4 * 4x^3

This is not an easy equation to solve by hand but it can be solved by using a software. This is why for MCAT purposes, you can safely reduce 1-2x expression to 1 by assuming that x will be significantly smaller than the initial concentrations at equilibrium. This makes sense because in equilibrium, you'll have a mix of both reactants and products and generally, all the reactants or all products won't be entirely consumed. Not to mention, x can't be larger than 0.5 because the ICE table in the problem would suggest the final amount of product would be negative, which is not possible.

Note that this small x approximation shortcut won't always work but you won't see this on the MCAT.