- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction score
- 102
So recently our hospital system has been aggressive about HCT 'utilization' in both peds and adults. The 'numbers' were brought to our attention at the last quarterly meeting. Most people are in the middle with a few outliers.
I wasn't aware of a CMS measure of utilization of HCT specifically but I suppose it is factoring in to cost equations for the hospital, although I was under the impression that 'advanced imaging' increased RVU's.
I tend to heavily use Canadian HCT/C-spine/Nexus/PECARN etc, so I am not an outlier, and can definitely see the utility in peds specifically. In adults not so much - too many elderly MVC's and intox/polysubstance/assault/trauma, for it to really seem like it would make a difference in our population.
Just wondering if this is yet another way to potentially separate us from revenue or if there is some national criteria pending/CMS measure i haven't yet heard of?
also, how does this factor into large Lvl 1 centers where pan scan is deeply rooted?
I wasn't aware of a CMS measure of utilization of HCT specifically but I suppose it is factoring in to cost equations for the hospital, although I was under the impression that 'advanced imaging' increased RVU's.
I tend to heavily use Canadian HCT/C-spine/Nexus/PECARN etc, so I am not an outlier, and can definitely see the utility in peds specifically. In adults not so much - too many elderly MVC's and intox/polysubstance/assault/trauma, for it to really seem like it would make a difference in our population.
Just wondering if this is yet another way to potentially separate us from revenue or if there is some national criteria pending/CMS measure i haven't yet heard of?
also, how does this factor into large Lvl 1 centers where pan scan is deeply rooted?