***HELPPP - Please read if you got accepted to one of the TEXAS schools!!***

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
At first glance..3.3 sci gpa makes me wonder what sci courses you have taken and what grades did you receive? I know Baylor weighs sciences especially upper levels VERY heavily.
 
Isn't that a telling sign of a good interview - when your interviewer just does most of the talking about themselves?? We laughed and smiled together, she even said I spoke very well. Do you think my interviewer would just pretend and act like it was a "good" interview when in fact it wasn't???

Of those who got accepted with these same stats, can you give me your 2cents on why you think I did not get in? What are my red flags?? What do you think your application had or what did you do during your interview that won it for you? I know I still have a shot at 2nd round, but I am not keeping my hopes up like I did last year....please help

A good interviewer makes every one feel they were accepted. Unless you blew the interview, which you do not feel you did, it is not that so much whether you had good interview, but rather that there are many others applicants that had good interviews and much better stats.
Your low GPA should be offset with at least a 20, 20, 20, and even then you could still find yourself on the cusp.
 
Top