I'm an R2 very much undecided between heme/onc and rheum. Both have their pros and cons.
Heme/Onc: I find it more interesting than rheum and already have research in this field. However, I'm concerned with emotional burnout with the patient population and intensity of the fellowship as compared to rheum. Even after fellowship, I perceive heme/onc to be higher stress and work hrs than rheum, not sure if this is true. Onc patients are also unpredictable and I feel, higher acuity than rheum patients.
Rheum: Shorter and less intense fellowship than heme/onc? I also hear it is in demand but then I assume that finding a job in heme/onc would not be difficult either. I'd rather not deal with chronic pain patients. I am drawn to this field because the patients are really appreciative and I can see tangible effects of the meds. No current research in rheum yet.
All things being equal(namely the income), can you guys give me some advice here?
Heme/Onc: I find it more interesting than rheum and already have research in this field. However, I'm concerned with emotional burnout with the patient population and intensity of the fellowship as compared to rheum. Even after fellowship, I perceive heme/onc to be higher stress and work hrs than rheum, not sure if this is true. Onc patients are also unpredictable and I feel, higher acuity than rheum patients.
Rheum: Shorter and less intense fellowship than heme/onc? I also hear it is in demand but then I assume that finding a job in heme/onc would not be difficult either. I'd rather not deal with chronic pain patients. I am drawn to this field because the patients are really appreciative and I can see tangible effects of the meds. No current research in rheum yet.
All things being equal(namely the income), can you guys give me some advice here?