- Joined
- Oct 1, 2010
- Messages
- 744
- Reaction score
- 4
Just curious mainly about this. I heard the highest theoritical score is 300 but has anyone ever even gotten 290 even? And would such a score virtually guarantee you any residency/any where you want?
I've seen low 280's
I've seen low 280's
I guess this means 270 is the best score. /threadI have an insider PD at Hopkins who said they systematically reject 270+ scores because they are lacking sufficient social/personalization skills.
They do interview them, but from his experience, they are brain dead when it comes to interacting with other members of the team
the main thing they look for us how well you will fit in with the existing team. Team-dynamics is key, so if a person throws that off, it affects everyone
A student from my school
can you put an exact number on it?
...the main thing they look for us how well you will fit in with the existing team. Team-dynamics is key, so if a person throws that off, it affects everyone
It's fun to read posts like this, but Jason Chang is an outlier.
As Jason Chang (Pollux) mentions in his post, our school does not cover pharmacology, microbiology or biochemistry in the slightest, so it is ironic that University of Queensland has generated some of the world's highest USMLE scores. I'm not surprised by Jason's 276. Our students generally go through a "freak out" phase where we realize that our school isn't teaching us anything, then the result is our over-compensation with respect to external studying. To that effect, I've actually found that the subjects UQ doesn't teach to be among my strongest in QBank so far. UQ tends to incorporate a lot of what would be considered 2CK material into its preclinical years. For example, I've been tested on how to grade the severity of a patient's pneumonia, but never anything on the lysosomal storage diseases or monoclonal antibodies as drug-therapy. Interesting to say the least.
It's an internal file provided to us by my school that lists the range of scores of past classes over the last few years. I believe this person went into some surgical specialty, but I have no other information to supply about that person. Also, I didn't realize that this thread was about step 1 strategies, just the highest score that I've heard of.Do you have a post, forum or webpage that you could provide a link to that elaborates on that particular experience? That would be great! So we could all learn from that. Otherwise anyone here could just say "294," but that doesn't mean much.
I think it is important to point out that Jason Chang scored a 258 on NBME 1 NINE MONTHS OUT. Scores like this are great to shoot for, but you have to realize that this person had amazing scores from almost the beginning of his second year.
I think it is important to point out that Jason Chang scored a 258 on NBME 1 NINE MONTHS OUT.
I'm surprised there arent any official stats to show scores.
I have an insider PD at Hopkins who said they systematically reject 270+ scores because they are lacking sufficient social/personalization skills.
They do interview them, but from his experience, they are brain dead when it comes to interacting with other members of the team
the main thing they look for us how well you will fit in with the existing team. Team-dynamics is key, so if a person throws that off, it affects everyone
Wrong, so wrong. Try again.
not really top secret..but rather not provide names on a public forum...i hope you understandBut being a super duper team player will make up for a 190 step score according to that top secret insider.
:
Most of the people I've met with super-high scores were also fairly decent communicators. Usually, if somebody is smart enough and hard-working enough to score a 270, they've also learned how to interact with people (even if it's not a talent with which they were born).
Maybe my school is different, but I only know a couple of people who are strange enough to cancel out a potentially high score... but neither of them have particularly high scores either.
No score is considered alone, but it's the first thing that I look at on paper. Those very few that score 270+ always Wow! you in some way, there's reasons behind that number. "Team dynamics" don't really factor in the application process at the top residencies where they really want clinical and/or research exellence. And a 190? That's 40 points under the cutoff for most top programs.
I didn't mention anything about a 190....
I just mean that there is a number cutoff at the low end (190 is just passing) at the top programs. A 220 with a great application would get consideration in EM, IM, or GS at a mid-level residency, but won't be considered at a Top 25.
Is that really true?
Is that really true?
Sounds about right to me... not sure why it should be a surprise. You can't expect to get into a top-25 program with an average score.
Is that really true?
I'm pulling this information off of the IM Match Thread 2012 from a poster named hannibalct:
"- MD/PhD at top 10 school
- Step 1 218 (eff u carnitine shuttle), Step 2 248
- no AOA at our school, no ranks
- multiple first author pubs (sadly doing this **** for multiple years, good times)
- honors in all med school clerkships
- no away rotations
- 20 applications, rejected by some big ones (BWH, UCSF, Hopkins, Stanford, BID, Wash U) and some not big ones (UNC and Colorado)
- interviewed at MGH, Duke, Penn, Michigan, Cornell, Chicago, NWestern, UW, Yale, Pitt
- ranked 10 places
- matched at MGH
- matched at 1st place on rank list
- things that I think helped my app: phone call from PD, research, MD/PhD, but really, the process makes no discernible sense (recruiting calls from Duke, no love at UNC)"
That being said, MGH is not average. In this case, research was key to the application.
Of course, there are exceptions... if you have a PhD and a 248 on Step 2, that more than makes up for the average Step 1 score.
i heard harvard also systematically reject those w/ 270.. dont know if its true
Yeah, I don't know where people are getting their cut-off information, but I know of residents at my (top-25) institution who have <220's. None of them have PhD's that I'm aware of. We're not talking derm or ortho though obviously.
and several IMG applicants from Mexico.
Only Mexico?
...but I was wondering if programs in Texas have a tendency to have all of their IMG spots reserved for Mexican graduates.
All Texas programs can take IMG's from anywhere. We want to keep three or four IM match spots for Mexican grads because of our specific relationship with Mexican health entities. There are IMGs from every country on the map working in Texas after doing their residencies here.
At UT-Houston and MDAnderson we want high quality IMGs, as we see Houston as an international city and the Texas Medical Center as a resource for the world. You will find foreign grads in every department; example:
http://www.uth.tmc.edu/schools/med/imed/Assets/pdf/0708Roster.pdf
no Caribbean IMGs? lol
I'm pulling this information off of the IM Match Thread 2012 from a poster named hannibalct:
"- MD/PhD at top 10 school
- Step 1 218 (eff u carnitine shuttle), Step 2 248
- no AOA at our school, no ranks
- multiple first author pubs (sadly doing this **** for multiple years, good times)
- honors in all med school clerkships
- no away rotations
- 20 applications, rejected by some big ones (BWH, UCSF, Hopkins, Stanford, BID, Wash U) and some not big ones (UNC and Colorado)
- interviewed at MGH, Duke, Penn, Michigan, Cornell, Chicago, NWestern, UW, Yale, Pitt
- ranked 10 places
- matched at MGH
- matched at 1st place on rank list
- things that I think helped my app: phone call from PD, research, MD/PhD, but really, the process makes no discernible sense (recruiting calls from Duke, no love at UNC)"
That being said, MGH is not average. In this case, research was key to the application.