- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Hi all,
Just taking a break from biochem, and thought I'd start a discussion (way off topic)...
I've noticed that a few of people I've bumped into are outright hostile towards science and those that work in a scientific field. Not necessarily any particular segment of the population, but across the board.
Case in point, I was lounging at a coffee bar the other day just chilling (and yes, worring about biochem), when I overheard two ladies talking about their dating prospects (sorry, couldn't help but to eavesdrop, but they were being loud), and they went on about how they couldn't see why "normal" person (their words) would go into science when there was law, sales, business, marketing...etc, etc. They continued to discuss such a person in a way that was hardly flattering.
This wasn't the first time I've heard something like this lately, and a "few" times is hardly a statstically valid sample, but it stuck me as very odd because I've never heard anything like this.
It got me to thinking...who DOES speak for "science" these days? Back in the day, we had Carl Sagan, and his "Cosmos" series really sparked the fire for my wonder of the universe. Nothing I see today remotely comes close.
Sigh, rant off...gotta get back to the Krebs Cycle...
Best,
Oldie
Just taking a break from biochem, and thought I'd start a discussion (way off topic)...
I've noticed that a few of people I've bumped into are outright hostile towards science and those that work in a scientific field. Not necessarily any particular segment of the population, but across the board.
Case in point, I was lounging at a coffee bar the other day just chilling (and yes, worring about biochem), when I overheard two ladies talking about their dating prospects (sorry, couldn't help but to eavesdrop, but they were being loud), and they went on about how they couldn't see why "normal" person (their words) would go into science when there was law, sales, business, marketing...etc, etc. They continued to discuss such a person in a way that was hardly flattering.
This wasn't the first time I've heard something like this lately, and a "few" times is hardly a statstically valid sample, but it stuck me as very odd because I've never heard anything like this.
It got me to thinking...who DOES speak for "science" these days? Back in the day, we had Carl Sagan, and his "Cosmos" series really sparked the fire for my wonder of the universe. Nothing I see today remotely comes close.
Sigh, rant off...gotta get back to the Krebs Cycle...
Best,
Oldie
