- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Messages
- 7,132
- Reaction score
- 1,255
Here is a nice math summary I found at the bubble blog highlighting the issue at hand:
http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=1770#comments
Here is the fundamental problem as I see it: We have had record low interest rates that allowed lender to get really, really creative. This unfortunately let people qualify for mortgage they really can't afford. From the IRS website, here are the floors for each income threshhold (i.e. the smallest income for that bracket) from 2003 (the most current):
Top 1%: 295,495
Top 5% 130,080
Top 10% 94,891
Top 25% 57,343
Top 50% 29,019
To understand these numbers, they show that if you earned $29,019 in 2003, you were the lowest income in the top 50% of all incomes.
Now, using a mortgage qualifying calculator at http://www.webbuildersolution.com/calculator/MortgageQualifier.cfm?calcid=2&id=17629, and assuming NO OTHER DEBT beond the mortgage, here is the home you can qualify for:
Top 1% 881,606
Top 5% 382,435 (wow! what a drop)
Top 10% 288,335 (yikes!)
Top 25% 177,365
Top 50% 93,516
So, in my analysis, once underwriting returns to more normal proportions, only 1 in 100 households can qualify for these $1,000,000+ properties. So it seems to me that an artificial demand was created by underwriting guidelines. If the lenders tighten up, then fewer and fewer people will qualify, and that means less demand and we all know what happens as supply and demand try to find thier equilibrium.
HARD LANDING, HERE WE COME!
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thr...sing_2.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_blogspotting
http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=1770#comments
Here is the fundamental problem as I see it: We have had record low interest rates that allowed lender to get really, really creative. This unfortunately let people qualify for mortgage they really can't afford. From the IRS website, here are the floors for each income threshhold (i.e. the smallest income for that bracket) from 2003 (the most current):
Top 1%: 295,495
Top 5% 130,080
Top 10% 94,891
Top 25% 57,343
Top 50% 29,019
To understand these numbers, they show that if you earned $29,019 in 2003, you were the lowest income in the top 50% of all incomes.
Now, using a mortgage qualifying calculator at http://www.webbuildersolution.com/calculator/MortgageQualifier.cfm?calcid=2&id=17629, and assuming NO OTHER DEBT beond the mortgage, here is the home you can qualify for:
Top 1% 881,606
Top 5% 382,435 (wow! what a drop)
Top 10% 288,335 (yikes!)
Top 25% 177,365
Top 50% 93,516
So, in my analysis, once underwriting returns to more normal proportions, only 1 in 100 households can qualify for these $1,000,000+ properties. So it seems to me that an artificial demand was created by underwriting guidelines. If the lenders tighten up, then fewer and fewer people will qualify, and that means less demand and we all know what happens as supply and demand try to find thier equilibrium.
HARD LANDING, HERE WE COME!
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thr...sing_2.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_blogspotting