I could never find a answer to this, so I was wondering if anyone here knew.
The MSAR provides data on the 10%/90%/median sGPA and "overall" GPA for each school. AMCAS generates GPAs for both undergrad, high school (through CC, dual enrollment, etc), and an "overall" composite of the two. I think it's fairly well agreed upon that of these, the undergrad GPA is weighted more heavily.
However, what does each school display on the MSAR? Is it the undergrad GPA of accepted students or the composite? I'd wager that most students' composite GPA is higher because, well, CC classes taken in high school are easy. I'd also wager that given the choice, schools would prefer to post the higher score. It makes them look better.
Is this what happens? In most cases, the difference is small enough not to matter, but I'm curious nonetheless.
TLDR; Is high school status GPA incorporated into the GPAs displayed in the MSAR, and if so, won't that inflate the values?
The MSAR provides data on the 10%/90%/median sGPA and "overall" GPA for each school. AMCAS generates GPAs for both undergrad, high school (through CC, dual enrollment, etc), and an "overall" composite of the two. I think it's fairly well agreed upon that of these, the undergrad GPA is weighted more heavily.
However, what does each school display on the MSAR? Is it the undergrad GPA of accepted students or the composite? I'd wager that most students' composite GPA is higher because, well, CC classes taken in high school are easy. I'd also wager that given the choice, schools would prefer to post the higher score. It makes them look better.
Is this what happens? In most cases, the difference is small enough not to matter, but I'm curious nonetheless.
TLDR; Is high school status GPA incorporated into the GPAs displayed in the MSAR, and if so, won't that inflate the values?
Last edited: