How crucial is research?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sporkthief

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm a first year who is interested in radiology, and I'm receiving conflicting advice. I spoke with my dean yesterday, and he informed me that in order to guarantee the strength of my application in a few years, I should do radiology research this summer. He proved this by whipping out a book that listed the radiology competitiveness as "high." Now, I know radiology is a competitive field, but is it really this competitive? Is research a necessity?

The other advice I received was from two radiologists practicing in my hometown. Neither one of them had done research, and they ended up just fine. They said do whatever you want with this summer, it will be your last.

Who to believe? I really don't want to shoot myself in the foot by not doing research.

Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Truth is, it helps an average application, and it improves your stock at bigger academic centers. If you are a stud, with AOA, monster boards etc. dont do the research unless you want to. If you are a decent applicant, form a good school, and your are happy with a community based rads program, you dont need the research.
 
Disclaimer: I'm a 4th year, currently applying in radiology. I might not know anything. I might actually be a dog. You should get advice from a good mentor in person, not from a message board.

First, radiologists who are currently practicing didn't match in the current competitive environment; it's really a different environment for the past couple of years as opposed to even five or six years ago. (I don't have the statistics to back this up on hand; perhaps someone else could post a link to them?)

Second, my impression of this process is that KerleyB is absolutely right. A graduate of a US allopathic school who has above average board scores and decent clinical grades and who is able to communicate a sincere interest in radiology will certainly be able to match somewhere. (As long as s/he applies broadly and doesn't come across as a complete whack job at his/her interviews.)

Third, research can really strengthen an application. If you have some hole in your application (so-so board scores, mediocre clinical grades, some other weird thing), you can partially compensate with research. It's just one more way for you to convince programs that they want you. Or, if you want to shoot for more academic centers or you want to have a better chance at matching in a particular city, research is an important way to make yourself more attractive.

Fourth, the term "research" covers a multitide of activities. Most academic radiology departments have a bunch of projects which would qualify as research (and lead to publications or presentations, the key tangible of the process). These projects might be: bench research, statistical analysis, generating graphs, preparing an educational poster, writing up a case report, organizing teaching files. There are lots of possibilities, depending on your inclination. You can probably find something that appeals to you that won't feel too much like making license plates.

Fifth, if you start research at the end of your first year, you can build up both a project and a mentor-protege relationship over the next two-and-a-half years. Both can be important assets in the application process, which starts sooner than most medical students think. If you start early, you can definitely turn that to your advantage.

To sum up, it's not actually required, but your dean is right; research helps. If you want to do everything you can to advance your career, you'll find a project.

BTW (1), if you're thinking about this kind of stuff now, you could get a lot out of reading Iserson's Getting Into a Residency. It's pretty readable, and it spells things out for you pretty clearly. And again, you can get a big advantage out of reading it at the end of your first year, rather than at the end of your third.

BTW (2), if you change your mind about radiology, a serious commitment to any of the kinds of research will definitely help you in almost any specialty you might apply to. Obviously, if you were applying to surgery, surgery-related surgery is best, but it matters less than you think. If you can demonstrate an ability to focus on something and some of the basic research skills (organized thinking, statistics, writing, etc.), you'll really help yourself in any field.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Oops. You know what I mean. :p
 
i am considering tking a year to go abroad to do population based studies on refugee populations to look at the prevelance of psychologic disorders. if i were to do this, and then later decide to apply to radiology will i have to explain why i did this and not spent my tie diong something more directly related to radiology?
thanks!
 
prostate said:
i am considering tking a year to go abroad to do population based studies on refugee populations to look at the prevelance of psychologic disorders. if i were to do this, and then later decide to apply to radiology will i have to explain why i did this and not spent my tie diong something more directly related to radiology?
thanks!

Na, no one should bust your chops about it, but it would probably make for interesting conversation at your rads interviews. I am a psych undergrad, so some rads interviews got into that stuff - interesting talking to old school rads attendings about the efficacy of therapy vs medication for depression.

It would certainly be better to spend your time in rads research if you are willing to spend time in research AND are interested in rads. However, the bottom line (I think) is that programs like research because it shows academic curiosity, time management, willingness to do extras, etc etc. so you should be fine.

By the way that project sounds kinda interesting.... enjoy!
 
Top