rEliseMe:
Oh. I have to agree. I applied to 1 school because I wasn't really ready for 2010. I only figured out that I wanted to be an Audiologist last fall (and apps were already in). I had prior experience with the school I applied to and loved it. After visiting, the chair of admissions encouraged me to apply despite a lot of needed stuff. Believe me... No one is more shocked that I am already an incoming student!
Nice username by the way! 👍
I have to simply agree with your third point. There are many many schools across the country (for audiology, in my opinion) and it can be a sweat during the process of weeding them out to the perfect fit. I have learned that if you go out of your way to contact some AuD students, professors, directors or a alumni who is(or fromt) at your "dream" school, you will learn so much about the AuD program. I have obtained some decent amount of info from these particular people than what I found on their websites.
Also, once you keep in contact with these people, you feel much more confident when it comes to writing your grad letter because most likely some of those people you keep in contact with are the ones going through your grad packages and reading your letter. If you haven't talked to one person at your top choice AuD school or done any serious research, I will guaranteed you that when you write your letter, it's going to be frightening! Trust me, I learned that lesson when I was applying to big private schools (USC and UC Berkeley for linguistics program).
SoCal... Thanks!
I agree with your input 100%. "Getting to know" the professors, students, etc... really made my letter more personal (which is what they wanted). Not only that, I gained insight into the school and staff. I also kept my name in their inboxes as I updated them (at their request). By interview time, I had developed friendships with students and a mutual respect with the faculty.
rEliseMe:
The point is... When I went to AudiologyNOW!, I met so many students who had been wait-listed by multiple schools for more than one year. MOST of these people, on paper, are more qualified than me. Not one of them had ever visited the school they applied to. Not one of them had actually had contact with the faculty ouside the telephone interview. This has been confirmed by posts I've seen on this forum site.
In my own situation, I impressed them in some areas, but I don't think that did it. What I did, that I believe was significant, was work hard to connect with them. I flew to the school. Asked what would make me a strong candidate. When they told me, I went and did it the next day! I then emailed them with after each step, so they knew that I was serious and wanted to be there.
Pick 5 schools, but if you want to go to one school in particular, arrange a tour of that program. Gain contact information for staff (including the head of selections) and keep in contact every few weeks (find a reason- professionally). Raise the level of comfort and gain some insight into what they are looking for but REMAIN PROFESSIONAL.
There is a fine line to walk. This is a professional situation- tougher than a job interview. I
always wore a tie when visiting. I kept in contact, but every email had been proofread like it was the letter in my app. The point is, each school/panel is looking for something specific. The successful applicant is the one who sticks out because they "fit" into the program, not the most qualified cookie out of the cutter.
To sum up the way the professor did during my interview (I was offered the seat DURING the interview):
"Audiology programs are very small. In most situations, the study group size is the whole class. The program here is no different. Our job, when selecting students, is not just to find people who will be good students and great clinicians. Our responsibility is to the other students to create a cohesive group that will foster better learning. We are interviewing to find a piece that will make the whole structure stronger."
That is why, in small programs like audiology, it is important to find your "fit" and prove to them that you are the piece that is missing.