I have to agree with that. I think medical education would benefit greatly from a revamping- I mean, outside of some physics, and some minor biochem, how much of what your studies for your MCAT has had any impact at all on your medical education? And I don't even mean the first 2 years of med school either: those seem to exist SOLELY to provide cushy, tenured positions to old science blowhards who, as stated before, have never treated a patient. When do you really learn pathology, pathophysiology, pharmacology? It's when you are DOING it, and that means clinical work.
I think a move to whittle away much of the first two years of uneccesary "medical" lecture, and replacement with more clinical years would vastly improve the "third year experience" that we all have to go/have gone through. Anatomy, physics, micro, a couple weeks of biochem, and you're ready to go!
It's also similarly frustrating to have to take a shelf exam or boards that are 3-5 years behind your clinical practice experience, be it with new drugs, imaging, or other management techniques. You learn to go, 'Oh, well in real life I would do this, but I have to answer C here because this is what my Pre-test books tell me is the correct answer.' It's rediculous! Why shouldn't the STEP exams let us use palm pilots for drug information, or uptodate, or similar? In a clinical scenario, which we all work in, that is what the experience is like. It seems that those who memorize the most the fastest get the 98%s, no matter how intelligent you are. Isn't that a problem?
Revamp all of it, stop using the MCATs to simply take the smartest, and instead invite those who are, yes, gifted, but personable, and able to _connect_ with people. We all know that a good doctor in any field is one who is capable of fostering relationships with his/her patients. You don't have to have an IQ of 158 to do this, or have perfect memorization skills.
Heh, sorry, I guess I got off track here. Hope some of my rant helped, at least!