- Joined
- Dec 8, 2003
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 1
I realize this may a bit off topic, but I'm looking for some knowledge from people with perspective (as opposed to the pre-meds who are often right but sometimes waaay off).
I am asking for some perspective because I am leaving law school to go to med school (probably a source of my disorientation). Law is extremely geographically-centered. You had better be a resident of a certain state if you want to practice in that state (particularly for non-international business centers). If you're not a resident, you had better go to school in that state or go to a VERY highly ranked school (and usually that doesn't help that much for some areas) to stand a chance to practice in a region (e.g. if I wanted to practice law in Charleston, I, by all means, should go to the University of South Carolina). Is medicine like this?
That is, how much will the school affect where I will be able to obtain my residency and how much will my residency affect where I will practice medicine some day? Is there a degree of latitude where people can move from place to place with freedom or no?
I am looking at a career in pediatrics, where obtaining a residency is less competitive than other specialities. I absolutely love kids, enjoyed shadowing peds doctors, etc... How would this affect my decisions down the road? if I chose a "more competitive" residency program in another field?
I'm trying to get a feel for how much geographic freedom I'll have. Will I be disadvantaged by going to a TN school if I want to live in Charleston? live in California?
Or if those are my goals, would I be better off moving to South Carolina and esablishing residency (SC and TN state schools are about equally competitive--3.6 28 or 29, similar acceptance rate)?
I think this whole law school experience messed with my mind.
Thanks!
I am asking for some perspective because I am leaving law school to go to med school (probably a source of my disorientation). Law is extremely geographically-centered. You had better be a resident of a certain state if you want to practice in that state (particularly for non-international business centers). If you're not a resident, you had better go to school in that state or go to a VERY highly ranked school (and usually that doesn't help that much for some areas) to stand a chance to practice in a region (e.g. if I wanted to practice law in Charleston, I, by all means, should go to the University of South Carolina). Is medicine like this?
That is, how much will the school affect where I will be able to obtain my residency and how much will my residency affect where I will practice medicine some day? Is there a degree of latitude where people can move from place to place with freedom or no?
I am looking at a career in pediatrics, where obtaining a residency is less competitive than other specialities. I absolutely love kids, enjoyed shadowing peds doctors, etc... How would this affect my decisions down the road? if I chose a "more competitive" residency program in another field?
I'm trying to get a feel for how much geographic freedom I'll have. Will I be disadvantaged by going to a TN school if I want to live in Charleston? live in California?
Or if those are my goals, would I be better off moving to South Carolina and esablishing residency (SC and TN state schools are about equally competitive--3.6 28 or 29, similar acceptance rate)?
I think this whole law school experience messed with my mind.
Thanks!