Ok, so I'm an FMG. Or, more acurately, an US-IMG, as they say these days.
And these past months I've been rotating through US hospitals learning medicine, and trying to figure out what, exactly, I missed by going to school abroad.
I've come to the conclusion that the answer to everything is voodoo.
VooDoo.
Starting at the beginning, take this website, for example:
www.mdapplicants.com
No matter what numbers you put in (well....within reason, of course) you will find people who get in. I put in 25 MCAT and 3.0 GPA....and got a few acceptances.
My advisor at Harvard advised me that it wouldn't even be worth my time and money to apply to med school with an MCAT of less than 30. Besides, with less than that they wouldn't even sponsor my app. Well, I beat that, got the grades, and they sponsored the app, and I still didn't get into to a U.S. school. Explain that to me?
So, there's all types graduating with U.S. M.D. degrees.
Does foreign education lack in some way? In my own school we have a nutty pathology professor lady who essentially make you memorize the big Robbins, and then gives you oral exams lasting hours on ~five chapter blocks.
I met at guy at my recent CSA from a U.S. school who had never done a pelvic exam on a real patient, just on mannequins.
Now, where do the home-grown docs excell? In paperwork, for one. If you are at one hospital for two years, well, then, you know exactly how to buff a chart, and whom to call for that rehab consult. But does that make you a better doctor...once you get to some other hospital...with a totally different system of documentation? And writing a patient note, is that rocket science?
One of my attendings at a NY hospital was an Indian guy. He looked at things once to remember them. He'd politely let you stumble through the patient's lab data, and then take over citing values (from memory) from three weeks ago.
What is the point, after all, of all of us taking Steps 1-3? What is being assued, or implied by a residency director who will take a U.S. grad with a Step of 175, but no foreigners below 200?
I had a resident who came to the U.S. at 12. So, he had grade school here, high school, med school, and now residency. And he had a stronger accent, and more screw-ups with his english (idiomatic, and otherwise), than my other resident, a Romanian, who'd been here a year and half, and had taught himself english in Romania. I had to ask the Romania where he was from because I wasn't sure if he even had an accent.
What's my point to all this? Well, I've had great docs on both sides of the ocean. And I've had crappy ones too. U.S. med students have a lot of advantages. And we foreigners have a lot of problems.
But high scores and a degree from Ivy U doesn't guarantee much other than you have a high score and a degree from a "good school."
If every U.S. student got 230's on the Steps, then the mean wouldn't be 214. Hell, the pass mark is 175. That in itself must be a measure of some competency. If it wasn't it would be higher, one would assume, right?
So, the answer is voodoo. Residency programs accept people for reasons probably not even known to themselves. If a program has a cut-off score, fine. But if it won't even consider me if I don't have 12 months of U.S. hospital experience, in spite of being above the cut-off, what's the point to that? Yet, another program has no minimum, and no experience requirements, and is at a "better" school. Sure, I see their point, they want a minimum level of competency. But in what? Chartwork?
Or what if I went to DO school? What then? I still learn the same stuff, still pass the same boards, still rotate at U.S. hospitals.
Voodoo.