- Joined
- Feb 18, 2011
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Pedigrees are one of those things that really annoy me. Chances are if I saw it on the MCAT, I'd probably mark it and move on to another problem. Choosing the correct Genetic Disease for Pedigrees seem to either require: a lot of generalized assumptions (ie. Dominant traits don't skip generations, where as Recessive traits typically do), but these assumptions are sometimes wrong. If I actually went through each answer choice and proved each answer wrong one by one, I would probably end up with the right answer but it would take ages to do (for me, like 3 or 4 minutes ...time better spent elsewhere). I was just wondering how everyone else feels about these types of problems. I'm hoping it's not something that'll show up on the MCAT, but I just want to cover my bases. If it wasn't in the AAMC outline, I wouldn't care to ask, lol.
Also, if someone who took the MCAT recently could shed some light on how complex a pedigree problems were (2,3, or more generations ...or even a passage), it would help a lot.
Thanks guys for the input.
Also, if someone who took the MCAT recently could shed some light on how complex a pedigree problems were (2,3, or more generations ...or even a passage), it would help a lot.
Thanks guys for the input.