- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,225
- Reaction score
- 1,144
Say, 15 years ago could you have a good chance at Harvard with a 513 or lower?
The score distribution has been stable - that is, the percent of people being awarded 30+ has not changed in the last decade.Not sure about GPA, but the theory of increasing average MCAT was that there were many more resources over the recent years.
I would imagine there were not much "Anki" "Khan Academy" "Online Full Lengths" 15 years ago.
Where were the applicants in all this? Where were the 37+ applicants applying if not Harvard and Yale?The score distribution has been stable - that is, the percent of people being awarded 30+ has not changed in the last decade.
There are more people applying each cycle now (about 30% greater than a decade ago), so the raw number of 30+ applicants has increased. However the applicant pool's growth has not been nearly enough to explain the rate at which top schools increased their medians.
What if... bear with me... they applied back then as well, but the schools didn't care as much about the MCAT so they just didn't get admitted in such overwhelming proportions.Where were the applicants in all this? Where were the 37+ applicants applying if not Harvard and Yale?
I see, the 37+ crowd was being outshined by them 30-33 scorers. Of course.What if... bear with me... they applied back then as well, but the schools didn't care as much about the MCAT so they just didn't get admitted in such overwhelming proportions.
Shocking right? Because you'd totally expect the people who score better on the MCAT to be stronger at everything admissions finds value in, amiriteI see, the 37+ crowd was being outshined by them 30-33 scorers. Of course.
Say, 15 years ago could you have a good chance at Harvard with a 513 or lower?