- Joined
- Nov 21, 1998
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 7,582
I'm hearing VERY nice things about this procedure.
It reimburses less than Vertiflex. For the right case it looks to be solid.I heard people are billing it as a spinal fusion, which may account for some of its popularity.
I asked my spine surgeon if he was interested since he is already doing Vertiflex. He was not impressed.
Why adopt?It’s billed as a spinal fusion, around 2k. Vertiflex only pays a few hundred dollars.
Its marketed as a less invasive fusion but why are no surgeons doing it. You’d think they would adopt it if it paid the same and was less invasive.
Sorry, facility side.It’s billed as a spinal fusion, around 2k. Vertiflex only pays a few hundred dollars.
Its marketed as a less invasive fusion but why are no surgeons doing it. You’d think they would adopt it if it paid the same and was less invasive.
It’s called efficiency...Can I be the guy to go ahead and do it?
Here we go - Lemme ask my wife; she is an expert at the Minute Man!
HA!
I guess the question is how does it compare with x stop, vertiflex and other intraspinous ligament implants. I personally use MILD first line at the stenotic level. Epidurogram for confirmation of decompression. Good outcomes and minimal post OP pain. Plus I don’t get money to plug Vertos... independent review .
I guess the question is how does it compare with x stop, vertiflex and other intraspinous ligament implants. I personally use MILD first line at the stenotic level. Epidurogram for confirmation of decompression. Good outcomes and minimal post OP pain. Plus I don’t get money to plug Vertos... independent review .
Typically, I select bilateral single level as my experience gets refined. Epidurograms are easy for all of us, plus it really provides visual proof of the posterior element decompression. I’d use the epiduogram , however most are not .Are you doing multiple levels bilateral?
Do you always do an epidurogram?
Link!Lots of drama on LinkedIn about minuteman
Disturbing to fuse someone for a disc herniation, if the commenters are correct about that. Could have had a microdiscectomy instead, probably with a smaller scar.I saw this on LinkedIn today and thought it might be relevant. Seems like the surgeons don't think it's a good long-term solution and may in fact lead to adjacent segment disease down the road from reading this comments
![]()
#minimallyinvasivespinesurgery #interventionalpainmanagement #minuteman… | Rutvij Shah, MD MPH | 96 comments
Minimally invasive interspinous fusion is a skillset that can treat someone’s long-standing complaint in an effective manner without too much tissue disruption from an open surgery. The case shows an objective evidence of how the disc degeneation was not only prevented but also reversed with...www.linkedin.com
Edit: just ignore all the fighting but there are some key points about the device itself
Link!