How important is a research/PI letter?

[monomania]

---

Members don't see this ad.

I worked in a lab for about 9 months, but I'm unsure of whether to ask for a letter from my research professor. I was away from the lab for the second half of the year due to MCAT study, and I sense that my professor still isn't very happy with that (and seems to question to my commitment to research). She said that she has several positive things to say, but that she can't yet endorse my research ability due to my somewhat short duration in the lab.

I've got 5 very good letters already (including 3 science professors from courses taken). I'm applying to several schools that are ranked highly in the US News research rankings. Do you think it's a concern for those research-oriented schools if I don't have a research letter? Thanks in advance.

 

[BBender716]

I'd say... maybe. I think regarding the importance of a research letter, it's not so much that they want to see a research letter (which they do...), but the fact that you'll have a "gap" that might be glaring depending on how things shake up. What I'm saying is that they'll see your application and 9 mos. of research and wonder "why no LOR from this research?" It may raise some eyebrows.

That being said. I do NOT think it's the end of the world for you.

Sometimes people think of professors/PIs as these high and lofty people. They may like to think so at times, but they are still just people-- talk to them! Just set up a 15 minute meeting with her, in person, or just find a time to talk and ask her if she would feel comfortable writing a strong letter of recommendation for you. Do not even mention the MCAT break time. If she mentions it as a reservation, THEN talk about it.

Worst case, maybe it just doesn't work out. At the least, you'll start repairing that relationship and I think you'd be surprised at her response if you put in some serious hours the past few weeks (if that was possible).

Best of luck!

 

[redlight]

I worked in a lab for about 9 months, but I'm unsure of whether to ask for a letter from my research professor. I was away from the lab for the second half of the year due to MCAT study, and I sense that my professor still isn't very happy with that (and seems to question to my commitment to research). She said that she has several positive things to say, but that she can't yet endorse my research ability due to my somewhat short duration in the lab.

I've got 5 very good letters already (including 3 science professors from courses taken). I'm applying to several schools that are ranked highly in the US News research rankings. Do you think it's a concern for those research-oriented schools if I don't have a research letter? Thanks in advance.

the thing is.. if you only have less than a year of research in your application, chances are it wont be a major selling point for top schools... am i right? if research has not been a significant activity for you, and you don't plan on doing lots of research or making it a big focus of career goals or whatnot on applications, then i don't think you need that rec letter.

 

[Mattabet]

In your case, I don't think you need it - especially given the PI's lukewarm duration sentiments. That said, if you get a good one from a PI, it is bound to help at those researchy schools. But I don't think your acceptance (somewhere) is going to hinge on a sixth letter.

 

[dd128]

It could be wondered if you emphasize the research in your app and then have no letter. Though if you have a number of solid letters in its place no one will probably think anything of it. The rule of thumb seems to be don't ask for a letter unless you are sure you can get a stellar one. If there is any doubt I probably wouldn't do it.

 

[ArkansasHogMD]

In your case, I don't think you need it - especially given the PI's lukewarm duration sentiments. That said, if you get a good one from a PI, it is bound to help at those researchy schools. But I don't think your acceptance (somewhere) is going to hinge on a sixth letter.

Usually, LOR writers will not write anything negative. They would simply decline to write one. Professors won't sabotage you. But if you list that you did research at all anywhere in your application, schools would wonder why there wasn't a letter from your PI. Hope this helps.

 

[LAman10]

those research-oriented schools might wonder why you're applying there if you have shown <1 year of research. I mean, they're ranked for research, right?

 

[STXGregor]

While most lor writers won't sabotage you, there have been some cases, though rare. OP, I don't think yours sounds like they would, just ask and speak to her honestly.

 

[scattun]

I used to also be of the opinion, that LOR writers wouldn't write a negative review, but my view has changed. Last year, I did interviews for one of my organizations on campus, and in my pile of eight applicants there was one LOR, that pretty much tore into the work ethic and maturity of the applicant. Granted, this is just one instance (but only out of 8 possibilities) and it was a high school teacher not a prof writing it, but it made me very cautious in selecting my reviewers. At the very least, have a very frank discussion with your PI. With less than a year with the lab though, and if you aren't emphasizing research in your application, I would just let this one be and go without the letter.