Thanks for answer.
Last edited:
I'm looking for reasons why Diagnostic Radiology still exists.
Sorry. I'm new. I should have posted this in the Med Business forum.
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:NHWK and http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:VRAD stock trends would seem to support my point. Seeing as how their stocks are underperforming, the shareholders should be looking at anything they can do to maximize shareholder value. If that means having to go through some legal battles and incur some short term losses in order to eliminate the middle man for a larger long term gain then why wouldn't they do it? Not only that, they could argue that the overworked rad is more likely to make a diagnostic mistake and thus "save lives" by using an accurate and automated solution.
I'm looking for reasons why Diagnostic Radiology still exists. I'm not trying to be too cynical, but with the investment in all the infrastructure for teleradiology it should be easy for some radiologist / corporation out there to just use an neural network based automated diagnosis system and just hit the "Diagnose" button and have a radiologist sign off on the slide and make a ton of money and drive competing rads out of business. I
Ed Beretta,
From one 'diplomat' to another,
CONGRATS!!!
Please do. And check out the stock trends of let's say Nighthawk. One of the bigger telerad companies.