perhaps a better question is, how do you see your team functioning as a med student?
are you following your own patient with the resident supervising? do you follow a patient in conjunction with an intern, and then a resident supervising?
or does everyone on the team follow every patient, and everybody's responsible for everything?
when you're looking at the labs, do you know what medications the patient is on? do you know the patient's diseases/illnesses/comorbidities? or, are you just looking at labs for the sake of looking at labs?
checking/fetching random person a's potassium of 5.6 probalby doesn't mean a whole lot.
getting miss jones' potassium of 5.6, with a history of hypertension on lasix, an ace inhibitor, and receivng potassium in her iv fluids might be a little more meaningful.
so, as a med student, perhaps you should ask yourself if you're looking at the whole picture... i.e. are you missing the trees for the forest?
if you're a med student on my team, you function as an intern- i.e. you'll be writing the h&p, you'll be following the patient on a daily basis, you'll be writing a daily progress note, you'll write the discharge plan. of course we'll go over things together, but the patient will be yours. so, if you consider following the potassium on a patient who has potassium in his/her iv to be scut, then i'll have a problem with that. if you consider checking the chest ekg on someone with chest pain to be scut, then i'll have a problem with that. if anyone on the team asks you to go pick up food from the local fast food joint, then i'll have a problem with that, because that is, in my opinion, scut.
but, the med students i have are often on their 4th year sub-i, so i expect more out of them.
as a 3rd year med student, especially at this time of year, people likely don't expect much, and in some ways may think that you're overwhelmed.
dr mcsteamy said:
but right now, it's completely mindless. Sometimes I see something in the labs:
"Oo0o0. hyperkalemia! Let's give him kayexalate...." "....yay...i'm so qualified to be a doctor.."
jp hazelton said:
If you give kayexelate for hyperkalemia you are NOT ready to be a doctor.
arthrodisiac said:
i really hate your posts.
jp hazelton seems ok, and this is, after all, just a message board. i suppose he could have decided to get into a long winded post about hyperkalemia, the potential causes, and the potential treatment. but, short of that, i agree with him that giving kayexalate off the bat for hyperkalemia does not make you ready to be a doctor.
what would be more appropriate would be to ask what the clinical setting/scenario is?
what's the ekg?
is there a potential for lab error?
is the patient npo?
does the patient have cardiac abnormalities?
does the patient have normal renal function?
what med(s) is/are the patient on?
but that would be long winded, and deviate this thread off topic...
