- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 0
It seems that in most residencies, not much was mentioned of didactics other than the standard, "x hours/week for Physics and y hours/week RadBio and (blah, blah) about the clinical didactics." However, some of the "top-tier" programs that I was fortunate enough to interview at did a much better job of detailing the quality of their didactics and were much more forthcoming with information pertaining to how they were run. So, a couple of questions:
1. How much should the quality of didactics factor in to making your rank order list?
2. It seems like a lot of learning RadOnc is just plowing through Gunderson, Perez/Brady and Red Journal on your own...is that correct?
3. Is it a red flag if a program doesn't say much about their didactics?
Any and all advice for those of us MS-IV's making our rank order list would be greatly appreciated. A big thank you to all of those who choose to contribute. 🙂
1. How much should the quality of didactics factor in to making your rank order list?
2. It seems like a lot of learning RadOnc is just plowing through Gunderson, Perez/Brady and Red Journal on your own...is that correct?
3. Is it a red flag if a program doesn't say much about their didactics?
Any and all advice for those of us MS-IV's making our rank order list would be greatly appreciated. A big thank you to all of those who choose to contribute. 🙂