- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 0
It seems that in most residencies, not much was mentioned of didactics other than the standard, "x hours/week for Physics and y hours/week RadBio and (blah, blah) about the clinical didactics." However, some of the "top-tier" programs that I was fortunate enough to interview at did a much better job of detailing the quality of their didactics and were much more forthcoming with information pertaining to how they were run. So, a couple of questions:
1. How much should the quality of didactics factor in to making your rank order list?
2. It seems like a lot of learning RadOnc is just plowing through Gunderson, Perez/Brady and Red Journal on your own...is that correct?
3. Is it a red flag if a program doesn't say much about their didactics?
Any and all advice for those of us MS-IV's making our rank order list would be greatly appreciated. A big thank you to all of those who choose to contribute.
1. How much should the quality of didactics factor in to making your rank order list?
2. It seems like a lot of learning RadOnc is just plowing through Gunderson, Perez/Brady and Red Journal on your own...is that correct?
3. Is it a red flag if a program doesn't say much about their didactics?
Any and all advice for those of us MS-IV's making our rank order list would be greatly appreciated. A big thank you to all of those who choose to contribute.